Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Unfit To Print?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    a place called, Liberty
    Posts
    9,922
    Thanks (Given)
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    314
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    441563

    Default Unfit To Print?

    God bless our men and women serving us....the People of the United States of America............

    October 13, 2007 -- Every major daily paper in New York took note of President Bush's deci sion to bestow the first Medal of Honor of Operation Enduring Freedom on Navy SEAL Lt. Michael Murphy - a Long Islander who gave his life for his country and his fellow SEALs.

    Every paper but one, that is.

    And it shouldn't be particularly hard to guess which one.

    By now, most folks know exactly how much The New York Times despises the U.S. military.

    How it detests any mission that involves U.S. troops - whether to protect Americans by killing terrorists or to help stave off a bloodbath in the Middle East.

    How the paper works tirelessly to promote its anti-war, anti-military agenda - even in its supposedly objective news pages.

    So while Bush's announcement merited stories and appreciative editorials in The Post, The New York Sun, the Daily News and even the front page of liberal Newsday, it shouldn't be all that surprising that the Times didn't publish a single word about Murphy's well-deserved honor.

    What did the paper of record focus on yesterday? No fewer than three stories reported on how Americans had killed innocent Iraqi civilians.

    Regarding the war, of course, the Times' "coverage" was pernicious long before the fighting began.

    Since then, it has focused obsessively on the mistakes and sins of American GIs (Abu Ghraib, anyone?) - and rarely has it played up U.S. victories.

    Indeed, it would be hard to cite a news outlet more responsible for sapping U.S. morale - and emboldening America's enemies - than the Times.

    But Murphy was a New Yorker.

    He served with unusual valor and distinction in Afghanistan.

    When Taliban militants ambushed his four-man team in 2005, he risked his life scrambling to an open spot to radio for help. He got his call through, but was later killed in the battle.

    Surely even editors at the Times could have had the heart to report - if not honor - such courage and self-sacrifice.

    Unless, of course, they're so blinded by their disdain for America's fighting men and women and their missions that they just can't muster the decency to do so.

    That must be it.
    http://www.nypost.com/seven/10132007..._to_print_.htm
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
    Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default

    The NY Times hit an all time low when they showed video of a US Marine dying




    Outrage! New York Times Posts Video and Pictures of Dying US Soldier!!

    ** Updated Below **
    The New York Times publishes photos and posts video of a dying US soldier!

    ** Now, the suffering Texas family is outraged! They were not contacted by the Times before the report was published!

    And... The Times reporters lost their embedded status after violating a signed agreement!

    The video is still posted on the NYT website even after the family complained about this report on their son on Tuesday. (4:40 PM CST, Wednesday)

    (I got through 5 minutes of the propaganda video before I had to turn it off and I have pretty high tolerance for media bias. Staff Sgt. Hector Leija is talking to the cameraman at the beginning of the clip. At the end of the clip he is down...
    This was just over the top.)

    Who needs a "Tokyo Rose" when you have the NYT, CNN, AP, CBS?


    http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/20...video-and.html

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306081

    Default

    More extreme right bullshit from the NY Post. Don't you ever read anything written intelligently?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    O-hi-o
    Posts
    12,192
    Thanks (Given)
    8017
    Thanks (Received)
    1650
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3656129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    More extreme right bullshit from the NY Post. Don't you ever read anything written intelligently?
    By intelligently you mean anti-American and anti-Military. I refuse to read the NYT as it is not an intelligently written paper.
    When I die I'm sure to go to heaven, cause I spent my time in hell.

    You get more with a kind word and a two by four, than you do with just a kind word.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,718
    Thanks (Given)
    23961
    Thanks (Received)
    17487
    Likes (Given)
    9715
    Likes (Received)
    6169
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
    By intelligently you mean anti-American and anti-Military. I refuse to read the NYT as it is not an intelligently written paper.
    Not often that we disagree. What they write is garbage at least 80% of the time, but it's usually written intelligently.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    990
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    550

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
    I refuse to read the NYT as it is not an intelligently written paper.
    K is right... I used to subscribe to the Washington Post but went back to the New York Times. Reason? The Post is liberal crap written by children. The Times is liberal crap written by adults. I guess I prefer the latter.
    America: White people footing the bill for a party they're not allowed to attend.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Lincoln View Post
    K is right... I used to subscribe to the Washington Post but went back to the New York Times. Reason? The Post is liberal crap written by children. The Times is liberal crap written by adults. I guess I prefer the latter.
    Dump the NYT and start reading the WSJ. It's conservative crap written by adults!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,718
    Thanks (Given)
    23961
    Thanks (Received)
    17487
    Likes (Given)
    9715
    Likes (Received)
    6169
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 5stringJeff View Post
    Dump the NYT and start reading the WSJ. It's conservative crap written by adults!
    Jeff, I don't find the WSJ print edition all that conservative. Do you?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    Jeff, I don't find the WSJ print edition all that conservative. Do you?
    The op-ed page tends to lean right, if only by comparison to the rest of the MSM. The normal stories have little, if any, spin.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,718
    Thanks (Given)
    23961
    Thanks (Received)
    17487
    Likes (Given)
    9715
    Likes (Received)
    6169
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 5stringJeff View Post
    The op-ed page tends to lean right, if only by comparison to the rest of the MSM. The normal stories have little, if any, spin.
    I agree with editorials to right, saw very much left spin in 'news.'

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    I agree with editorials to right, saw very much left spin in 'news.'
    I read it daily, and I haven't noticed, but I'll look for it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,718
    Thanks (Given)
    23961
    Thanks (Received)
    17487
    Likes (Given)
    9715
    Likes (Received)
    6169
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 5stringJeff View Post
    I read it daily, and I haven't noticed, but I'll look for it.
    The subscription was expensive, I kept it for nearly 5 years, they kept sending it for nearly 18months more. While less than Chicago Tribune, the cost just didn't add up.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    More extreme right bullshit from the NY Post. Don't you ever read anything written intelligently?
    Do you ever type anything intelligently? Why don't you back up just .001% of what your arse expels instead of just saying, eeew, excuse me.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,718
    Thanks (Given)
    23961
    Thanks (Received)
    17487
    Likes (Given)
    9715
    Likes (Received)
    6169
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default

    Here is the ceremony of Lt. Michael Murphy's parents receiving the Medal of Honor:

    http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/2...edal-of-honor/

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    3,000
    Thanks (Given)
    363
    Thanks (Received)
    1000
    Likes (Given)
    80
    Likes (Received)
    569
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5913561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    More extreme right bullshit from the NY Post. Don't you ever read anything written intelligently?

    "Written intelligently" --- Left speak for material that represents, or agrees with, the Left's world view, especially that of the New York Times.

    "Extreme right bullshit" --- Left speak for material that contradicts the Left's world view, disproves a belief of the Left's or puts the Left in a bad light.

    "Extreme right" --- any position that is to the right of those held by Marx, Lenin, or Engels.
    Last edited by KarlMarx; 10-23-2007 at 05:11 AM.
    How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums