Page 2 of 32 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 478
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    College Park, GA
    Posts
    4,749
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1681

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. P View Post
    Ahhhh well...no. Nice try, pfftttt not.
    Okay, so...nobody in his administration or in the intelligence community thought it'd be prudent to let him in on this little tidbit sooner?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Georgia!
    Posts
    11,817
    Thanks (Given)
    738
    Thanks (Received)
    668
    Likes (Given)
    1133
    Likes (Received)
    825
    Piss Off (Given)
    24
    Piss Off (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1203902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hagbard Celine View Post
    Okay, so...nobody in his administration or in the intelligence community thought it'd be prudent to let him in on this little tidbit sooner?
    Looks that way.
    UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION

    Above the Best

    Why the Hell should I have to press “1” for ENGLISH?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

    Default

    Just the Bushies lying to us AGAIN. Not a big deal.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    College Park, GA
    Posts
    4,749
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1681

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. P View Post
    Looks that way.
    In other words, the Bush administration is inept. Got it

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Burlingame,California
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hagbard Celine View Post
    In other words, the Bush administration is inept. Got it
    No man! Just like he alters other intelligence this was withheld until now as war fever is waning.
    A chance for a new beginning, like a dawn of reconciliation.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hagbard Celine View Post
    Okay, so...nobody in his administration or in the intelligence community thought it'd be prudent to let him in on this little tidbit sooner?
    i doubt they had it verified much sooner.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Just the Bushies lying to us AGAIN. Not a big deal.
    seriously, do you know what lying means?

    Can you deal with the fact that Bush's aggressive policies have indeed stopped Iran's nuclear program?

    If Bush was lying about anything, dont you think he would have hid the report? it doesnt take a rocket sciencist to conclude that.

    Seriously, you guys are the chief conspiracy nuts.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Communist China
    Posts
    2,325
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. P View Post
    Ahhhh well...no. Nice try, pfftttt not.
    Do you honestly think that if he had asked the DCI if his schtick to the American people about Iran and WWIII was on the level that he wouldn't have been told otherwise?????

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Communist China
    Posts
    2,325
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    seriously, do you know what lying means?

    Can you deal with the fact that Bush's aggressive policies have indeed stopped Iran's nuclear program?

    If Bush was lying about anything, dont you think he would have hid the report? it doesnt take a rocket sciencist to conclude that.

    Seriously, you guys are the chief conspiracy nuts.
    if by "aggressive policies" you mean invading Iraq, I think that is just an attempt to spitshine a turd.

    I think that you, nor I now who all was involved in the diplomatic efforts that causes Iran to rethink its nuclear weapons aspirations.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Georgia!
    Posts
    11,817
    Thanks (Given)
    738
    Thanks (Received)
    668
    Likes (Given)
    1133
    Likes (Received)
    825
    Piss Off (Given)
    24
    Piss Off (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1203902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by manfrommaine View Post
    Do you honestly think that if he had asked the DCI if his schtick to the American people about Iran and WWIII was on the level that he wouldn't have been told otherwise?????
    Donno what he was or would have been told...NOR do YOU.
    UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION

    Above the Best

    Why the Hell should I have to press “1” for ENGLISH?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Communist China
    Posts
    2,325
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. P View Post
    Donno what he was or would have been told...NOR do YOU.

    I never said I did...I only point out that the President CAN ask questions of the DCI any time he wants.

    He doesn't have to wait until the NIE is printed and published to find that stuff out along with everyone else.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11509

    Default

    The Iranian government has admitted they are maintaining a nuclear enrichment program. IAEA reports confirm Iran continues to work on perfecting centrifuge technology that could be used to create highly enriched uranium that could eventually be used in a nuclear weapons program.


    They halted, but yet admit they are continue the program of enriching, no wait, "perfecting" the technology that could be used to build nuclear weapons.

    You libs need to comprehend what is being said and stop listening to the mouthpieces at your favorite lib watering hole....MSM.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by manfrommaine View Post
    if by "aggressive policies" you mean invading Iraq, I think that is just an attempt to spitshine a turd.

    I think that you, nor I now who all was involved in the diplomatic efforts that causes Iran to rethink its nuclear weapons aspirations.
    Let's see:

    We invaded Iraq in 2003 and were more aggressive with the international pressure on Iran to discontinue their nuclear program.

    They discontinued the program in 2003.

    i can't imagine why they might have stopped the program.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    The Iranian government has admitted they are maintaining a nuclear enrichment program. IAEA reports confirm Iran continues to work on perfecting centrifuge technology that could be used to create highly enriched uranium that could eventually be used in a nuclear weapons program.


    They halted, but yet admit they are continue the program of enriching, no wait, "perfecting" the technology that could be used to build nuclear weapons.

    You libs need to comprehend what is being said and stop listening to the mouthpieces at your favorite lib watering hole....MSM.
    And why do you think they halted it? I think its obvious. They are waiting till Bush is out of office and hoping we elect someone who wont be as aggressive in stopping them.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    And why do you think they halted it? I think its obvious. They are waiting till Bush is out of office and hoping we elect someone who wont be as aggressive in stopping them.
    I don't really believe they "halted" anything. The part I bolded above was from the article. They say halt with one side of their mouth and yet admit they continue to perfect the technology required to build nuclear weapons. This "halting" thing is show only. For all I know, they outwardly stopped pursuing the "weapon" in 2003 because they could not get the technology right to enrich the weapon. I believe they just bragged about a new missile capable of going to Isreal and US interests in the ME.

    If they in fact did "halt", I am not sure it was directly because of Bush. Unless Bush was playing some hardball behind the scenes, I don't really recall him publically calling for Iran to halt in 2003.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums