Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
I guess the answer to my question was, "but, but," with the resurrection of all the other WTF conspiracies explained or unexplained.
The answer was pretty clear.

BUT
To make it clearer,
In a murder case how should you come to a final conclusion on the ID of the killer? Isn't It the preponderance of evidence?
If the WTF evidence is legitimately set aside by counter evidence that's fine.
BUT what does the all the remaining evidence point to?
BUT
IF you don't care about all the evidence just the optics and what the officials say, and what 'reasonable people' believe, then nothing else matter really.

BUT
what I get from your reply is that you think the right answer to your question is.
You you stop asking questions and ignore everything else since the WTF has been 'offically' answered.