Absolutely. When the going was good, the majority dems were all for it, then it became a little slow and they jumped the opportunistic band wagon of bashing Bush just to gain support from the uneducated people who can't see that Bush did win the war. What is wrong is not with Bush, it is with Iraqis. Let me be clear, what is wrong is not Bush, it is the Iraqis. They wanted Saddam gone.Originally Posted by stephanie
Make no mistake. Virtually all the muslims want(ed) him gone. Yeah. But then they wanted the US to get out quick. Why? To implement their view of "islam." That is the fight in the street now. It is marginally against the US, it is very much so about which muslim wants power.
If you complain that Bush has not done enough to quell violence, then why do you bitch when american troops kill Iraqis? In order to quell violence like this you need an iron fist. There is no other way. So either put up a solution or shut up.
And no, leaving is not a solution to winning, it simply says we give up. That is fine, and I often wonder if that is not the best course. But in no way, does that make Bush a bad leader. For anything Bush does you libs will say he lost, he is a bad leader... etc. All for power, not for the sake of the Iraqis, oh no....
Reply With Quote