Here is a link to a prior debate on this board. It's quite thorough and offers both my supporting arguments for the "official story" and at least the majority of the "conspiracies" from Sertes. We call those who think 9/11 was an inside job, but never offer anything of substance when it comes to evidence, as "truthers". I won't debate with someone who constantly offers no more than opinions or their disbelief.

If you have that evidence, I would love to discuss it with you. Have any questions about the prior debate, ask away.

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=7661