Results 1 to 15 of 45

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    168
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    42555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by logroller View Post
    I think you're putting the cart before the horse. Paterno was fired for the coverup, wasn't he? Had he reported the act, (not covered it up), he would have still been coach and still won those games, right? So how did the coverup result in those wins?
    It definitely is a football issue. They decided to cover it up because they thought it would harm the football program. Once they decided to cover it up, the cover-up allowed Paterno to keep coaching football. That's how it resulted in wins. No coach Paterno, no wins, at least for coach Paterno. So you vacate the wins. Think of vacating the wins as retroactively firing the coach. Instead of Paterno getting fired in 2011 for the cover-up, he would have been fired for the cover-up in 1998 had everyone known about it, and he would never had the chance to have won those games.

    But this isn't just a football issue. Paterno was a leader on campus. We hold leaders to high standards. It's not good enough to walk a line between legal and illegal. Kids got raped. He is culpable because he allowed a rapist to remain on campus. Had he turned Sandusky in, kids wouldn't have been raped. If he hasn't committed an illegal act, he certainly committed an immoral one, one that is unacceptable for a leader of his stature. That is a fireable offense.
    Last edited by Toro; 07-24-2012 at 07:14 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums