Originally Posted by fj1200
The ridiculousness is strong with this one.
You're going to have to be more specific than that because your talking points are getting a bit muddled. "Slow and steady" will not catch up to the unemployed because population growth is outstripping job growth. Besides, I think they'd take a vigorous private sector led recovery over the anemic government led one we have now. Your assertion to the contrary is silly..
That's because the problems were in the markets and not with F&F.
Only that final sentence applies to me.
funny how experts are not persuaded by your claim in that final sentence.
F&F is the housing market.
Reply With Quote