Results 1 to 15 of 220

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia, U.S.A.
    Posts
    14,203
    Thanks (Given)
    4834
    Thanks (Received)
    4690
    Likes (Given)
    2622
    Likes (Received)
    1605
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14075395

    Default

    <iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/MQeNgocaoDQ?feature=player_detailpage" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="640"></iframe>




    Richard Dawkins said: "…it is a remarkable fact that the greater part (95 percent in the case of humans) of the genome might as well not be there, for all the difference it makes.*"...
    "What pseudogenes are useful for is embarrassing creationists....

    It stretches even their creative ingenuity to make up a convincing reason why an intelligent designer should have created a pseudogene – a gene that does absolutely nothing and gives every appearance of being a superannuated version of a gene that used to do something – unless he was deliberately setting out to fool us.*"

    ..........
    "For 40 years, ever since Susumu Ohno introduced the term in 1972, they have been waving ‘junk DNA’ in the face of creationists, asking why their Creator God would have produced DNA with only 5% that had any function. Now they know, or are beginning to find out, that it wasn’t that it was without function, but simply that they knew too little about it to be aware of what it did. In fact this mirrors exactly the blunder they made 100 years ago or so, when they claimed over 100 human organs were vestigial: remnants of our evolutionary past that were no longer functional. They were wrong with vestigial organs 100 years ago, and they have been wrong for the past 40 years with junk DNA. Will they never learn?"

    And here's something to consider,
    the fact that scientist ASSUMED evolution is true and they EXPECT to find junk, that somethings are NOT going to be needed because evolution MEANS you have evidence of tranformation of purpose of parts over time. BUT honest "discovery" of the lack of useless parts and DNA is MORE evidence of a designer. Not of accidental change over time by environmental pressures.
    the belief of evolution has slowed the progress of real science here. It closed the mind to what continually being revealed by research. that biology at every level appears designed and the parts of every organism have current functions and purpose.
    Last edited by revelarts; 02-17-2014 at 09:25 PM.
    It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
    Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God.
    1 Peter 2:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums