Back then people were not as gullible as millions now are. So they did not claim back then that which looked to disprove Evolution as a factor in it being a valid theory.
What they have never explained is how species that were sent towards change by any catalyst thus had millions of years to effect that great change! For in their theory it was about survival and why change if it is so minor that millions(or even hundreds of thousands) of years the species can survive without that change!??
No sir, the logic and reality denies so much of their premise. Faith in the
magic of "eons of time" SERVES THAT PURPOSE.-
--Tyr
Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
Back then people were not as gullible as millions now are. So they did not claim back then that which looked to disprove Evolution as a factor in it being a valid theory.
Reply With Quote