Results 1 to 15 of 56

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia, U.S.A.
    Posts
    14,184
    Thanks (Given)
    4834
    Thanks (Received)
    4682
    Likes (Given)
    2597
    Likes (Received)
    1600
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14075394

    Default

    none of that is talking about new information
    except that last quote that says you don't need new information.

    "And of course animals that have a larval stage need 2 or 3 "complete" genomes for different phases of their lives."


    the simple creatures we came from and are found FAR EARLIER in the fossil record are MORE complex with 2 or 3 more genomes than we advanced creatures have, sooo that's "of course " evidence FOR evolution?! ....from the simple to the complex??


    the doublethink here is piling up

    Look before the genone projects evolutionary scientist where SURE that the "lower " creatures would have fewer genes than the "higher" ones. it was to be another EVIDENCE for evolution.

    but they were "shocked" "surprised" etc to find more genes in some very "simple" creatures. less in "modern'. And again "shocked" "surprised" to find the same numbers and kinds of genes across lines of animals they never imagined would have similar genome properties or number counts.

    but is that failed prediction consdiered a strike against the theory? what? of course not!

    Just as the science went against Darwin's prediction that the cell would be found to be a "simple" structure, a glob like thing.

    failed prediction

    and evolutionary scientist expected to find useless parts of genes and thought they found them and used them as evidence for evolution. But now know better since after observational science work it seems there are no useless genes.

    another failed prediction
    but they say again, that it doesn't mater, It's just evolved somehow to use everything.

    so again with each new discovery that goes AGAINST evolutionary PREDICTIONS the evolutionary story just changes to shoe horn in the new data. make up a NEW STORY.

    So now the evolutionary scientist foundational prediction that a creatures do randomly by environmental pressures do mutate NEW information in the genes to develop a wing, a liver, a new muscle, a fingernail, an eye, a tongue, photosynthesis, water resistant skin, camouflage, etc etc. THAT DOESN"T HAPPEN like they predicted.... or at all.... except in the dim unseen past we're sure.... but it doesn't matter if it looks impossible today.
    The BELIEF that it's It's still evolved somekindaway is not doubted.

    it appears unfalsifiable
    Last edited by revelarts; 02-27-2015 at 12:25 PM.
    It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
    Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God.
    1 Peter 2:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums