Seriously, between the sexual abuse and the usurpation of parental choices, it's out of hand:

http://wnep.com/2015/04/28/mom-says-...ot-nutritious/

AURORA, Colo. — A Colorado mother is upset after a teacher at her daughter’s preschool wouldn’t allow the girl to finish her lunch because it wasn’t nutritious.Leeza Pearson told KUSA that she packed her daughter a sandwich, string cheese and a four-pack of Oreos.

The Oreos were still in the child’s lunchbox, along with a note, which read:

Dear Parents, it is very important that all students have a nutritious lunch. This is a public school setting and all children are required to have a fruit, a vegetable and a healthy snack from home, along with a milk. If they have potatoes, the child will also need bread to go along with it. Lunchables, chips, fruit snacks, and peanut butter are not considered to be a healthy snack. This is a very important part of our program and we need everyone’s participation.
The director of Children’s Academy told KUSA that it’s not school policy to tell parents what their children can or can’t eat.
The school is now investigating.
Now I'm not arguing that the lunch was, but the teacher has no idea what is going on in that home. Not to mention it's none of her/his business. Many times parents just look in the fridge and cupboard, to see what they can send that will 'fill them up' because they'll eat it!

I was glad the director stated it's not school policy, which is better than many of the stories I've seen.

I have no problem with schools sending home notes or newsletters that contain information on nutrition, better yet some ideas with age appropriate suggestions for a low cost, balanced lunch.