Originally Posted by
Drummond
You're coming at this from an assumption there's equivalence in play. That candidates from all sides are 'equal'. That condemnatory opposition has equal worth, neither more correct or deserving of expression than the other.
Why ?
One side wants to uphold American values. Another wants to undermine them. Where is the 'equivalent' justice in each position, that each is as deserving as the other of censure ?
If one is MORE deserving ... then, if we see that, the condemnation is MORE deserving.