Or more accurately, the SC refused to hear about freedom loving nipples.

I think they need to show the courts the seriousness of denying freedoms to female nipples. Show a few men and then a few hundred women, and show the court that not only aren't they much different, they tend to be more appealing on the eyes.

--

US Supreme Court refuses to 'Free the Nipple' in topless women case

WASHINGTON, Jan 13 (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Monday decided not to "Free the Nipple," refusing to hear an appeal by three women fined by a city in New Hampshire for exposing their breasts in public who argued that banning female but not male toplessness violates the U.S. Constitution.

The justices left in place a 2019 ruling by New Hampshire's top court upholding the women's convictions for violating an ordinance in the city of Laconia that makes it illegal to show female breasts in public "with less than a fully opaque covering of any part of the nipple."

The women - Heidi Lilley, Kia Sinclair and Ginger Pierro - were involved in the "Free the Nipple" movement, which court papers described as campaigns against "sexualized objectification of women" and in favor of women being able to go topless in public if they wish.

Rest - http://news.trust.org/item/20200113140914-x3iun