Folks have many varied opinions on this. Makes complete sense as this is lives we're talking about, and world economies

For the most part, folks are most concerned with life and death first and foremost. Everyone wants to protect themselves and others. Just a difference in when, in how, informing one another on common sense and how we can all best protect one another. Folks may be disagreeing to an extent, but all still concerned about the welfare of others, even as we may be demanding rights or still having no choice but to go out. Point is, the massive concern for humanity is there. The sharing is there. Doing all we can to help one another is there. So yeah, some disagreement, but the concern for one another is at a high, IMO. Disagreeing, but getting everything out there the best we can so folks can remain informed. You get my point.

But then the left are different animals. Most of them have a primary goal of attacking orange man. So many outright wanting harm to the economy so it may harm Trump. Wanting bad news and even ignoring a ton, simply to make Trump look bad. And the lies. More this short year than ever before, and that's saying a lot. FEAR. Perhaps CNN and others are getting more viewers with folks home, and it's all negativity and fear and lies. But probably money, and whatever it takes to harm our country until Trump is out.

The right is talking about HOW we can protect the vulnerable, whether folks going out or not. We all know they are at most risk. Get the facts out.

The left is more interested in continuing the fear game and the blame game and the lying game.

---

We can protect the most vulnerable and reopen the economy

The struggle between President Trump’s drive to reopen the American economy as quickly as possible, and the insistence by his public health team and many others that this has to be delayed until further hurdles are overcome, is largely a false dilemma. We can simultaneously increase protection for those who are most vulnerable to coronavirus and, with appropriate precautions, reopen most of our economy and society.

The key to unlocking this false dilemma is a clear understanding of who, in fact, is most vulnerable to death from this novel killer — and who is not. As data from the deaths of the more than 58,000 of our fellow citizens to date show, the answer is clear.

Those at greatest risk of death from coronavirus are a subset of the 15 percent of Americans older than 65. More than 80 percent of all the deaths in America from coronavirus have come from this group. Moreover, the data show that vulnerability increases with age beyond 65, especially among individuals with one or more specific preexisting conditions. And among those who have died, three of every five have been males. In the death toll to date, how many were individuals under 25? Of the 200 million Americans under 45, how many have died from this novel virus? The answers are: fewer than 100 among under 25s and fewer than 1,000 under 45s.

Thus, in contrast to the specter of a nation at risk, when properly understood, coronavirus should be seen as a big threat to a small percentage of our population and a small threat to the overwhelming majority. To clarify this increased danger, it is instructive to distinguish between BC (before coronavirus appeared) and AC (after coronavirus). The fraction of Americans who today face a significantly greater risk of death than they did BC is likely to be roughly 10 percent.

Moreover, as we are debating choices about next steps up the staircase to reopening the economy, we should recognize that most of those individuals already had retired from the workforce before 2020 began. At the other end of the spectrum, risks of death from coronavirus among those under 65 essentially fall with age, risks for those in the earlier decades of life being substantially lower than many other threats they were living with BC.

President Trump has taken a step in the right direction in issuing guidelines on April 16 that specifically single out “the most vulnerable.” What is needed at this point is for the White House Task Force to follow up with more specific guidelines that it might label “Smart Steps” encouraging governors to exercise their ingenuity. Historically, one of the great strengths of our nation is that we have 50 “laboratories of democracy.” They can learn from each other how best to operationalize smart next steps ahead.

Rest - https://thehill.com/opinion/healthca...en-the-economy


Here, we just need to admit it, we WANT people to die is what they are claiming. Or this kind of bullshit.


Georgia’s Experiment in Human Sacrifice

The state is about to find out how many people need to lose their lives to shore up the economy.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...source=twitter

Not even gonna print the fear inducing blaming BS from this one, read on your own, the title is enough.