Results 1 to 8 of 8

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    13,992
    Thanks (Given)
    8494
    Thanks (Received)
    15312
    Likes (Given)
    3307
    Likes (Received)
    3837
    Piss Off (Given)
    27
    Piss Off (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    201 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475186

    Default Peace In Our Time?

    Does anyone else look at this Ukrainian situation and see the Western world led by a bunch of Neville Chamberlain wannabes from 1939?

    I realize that things aren't quite the same as then, with the advent of nuclear weapons, but the end result is the same. Utter annihilation of whole nations was always on the table.

    Russia has demonstrated a woeful lack of military cohesion, strategy and execution as they try to conquer a much smaller Ukraine. As we discussed before, their lack of logistics resupplying their offensive is a show of monumental incompetence. What few trucks they have are being mauled because of their rush to reach Kyiv, bypassing cities and expecting the Ukrainians to ignore mostly undefended convoys of trucks rolling in single file up the highway to bring fuel, ammo, parts and food to the troops.

    This inability to process the war led inevitably to the Russians resorting to indiscriminately shelling and bombing of whole cities, which was largely ignored in Syria and Afghanistan by the rest of the world, but is illegal and certainly constitutes war crimes.

    So, as thousands of civilians are subjected to indiscriminate shelling, Zelensky is pleading for NATO to enforce a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. This would largely level the playing field, given the impossible Russian ground resupply situation.

    A few countries in Europe - Poland and a few others, were going to give Ukraine a few MiG Fighters & attack Fighters, but Biden nixed that idea because of his fear of pissing off Putin. NATO cancelled the transfer.

    Anyone else remember Korea and Vietnam? Russia gave literally thousands of MiGs, along with Soviet 'advisors', combat instructors and even Soviet pilots flying MiGs against us in Korean & Vietnamese marked aircraft.

    They had nukes back then. So did we. It didn't escalate to nukes flying - the only time that was discussed was MacArthur advocating for that when he was pushed out of South Korea by that Chinese led offensive. He was summarily dismissed, mostly because of his insistence of using nukes.

    Anyway, there is a strong precedent for both Russia and China engaging in active air combat against NATO in at least two wars prior.

    Today all of the Western leaders are wringing their hands at the thought of opposing a nuclear armed dictator in the air as he clearly commits heinous war crimes.

    They are afraid of him and instead send Zelensky supplies and let what little military he has left to fight, along with largely untrained citizenry haphazardly firing off MANPADS & anti-tank missiles at a professional army - such as it is.

    In my mind, we have a bunch of Neville Chamberlains running the show, led by our sad feckless idiot who historically has been on the wrong side of every scenario his entire life.

    NATO needs to intervene, at the very least in the air. We could easily establish air superiority within 24 hours.

    Historical precedent allows us to, and pointing that out prior initializing it would make Putin accept it.

    Yes, he's got nukes. But so does the rest of the world.

    Allowing this psychopath to continue his slaughter as we cower from the sidelines is madness. He won't be satisfied with Ukraine, just as Hitler wasn't with Poland.

    The Baltic States are next on the menu after Ukraine is defeated.

    But our spineless leaders are still clinging to the hope that he'll stop once he has Ukraine.

    Peace in our time, right. Neville?
    Last edited by NightTrain; 03-07-2022 at 11:42 AM.
    Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums