Results 1 to 15 of 49

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia, U.S.A.
    Posts
    14,226
    Thanks (Given)
    4835
    Thanks (Received)
    4697
    Likes (Given)
    2639
    Likes (Received)
    1614
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14075395

    Default

    More bad news for the Big bang with the new cool space telescope.
    They Expected to see one thing but are seeing something else. (in science that's called a failed prediction)
    but they're still trying to shoehorn in some materialists explanations or make up theoretical rescue devices/excuses.

    All the galaxies LOOK OLD.... for a start (as stated in this thread before.)

    JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE SHOWS BIG BANG DIDN’T HAPPEN? WAIT…
    https://mindmatters.ai/2022/08/james...t-happen-wait/
    Physicist Eric J. Lerner comes to the point:
    To everyone who sees them, the new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of the cosmos are beautifully awe-inspiring. But to most professional astronomers and cosmologists, they are also extremely surprising—not at all what was predicted by theory. In the flood of technical astronomical papers published online since July 12, the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old. Lots of surprises, and not necessarily pleasant ones. One paper’s title begins with the candid exclamation: “Panic!”
    Why do the JWST’s images inspire panic among cosmologists? And what theory’s predictions are they contradicting? The papers don’t actually say. The truth that these papers don’t report is that the hypothesis that the JWST’s images are blatantly and repeatedly contradicting is the Big Bang Hypothesis that the universe began 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. Since that hypothesis has been defended for decades as unquestionable truth by the vast majority of cosmological theorists, the new data is causing these theorists to panic. “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning,” says Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, “and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.” [Update: Kirkpatrick has protested Lerner’s handling of this quotation. See Note below.]
    ERIC J. LERNER, “THE BIG BANG DIDN’T HAPPEN” AT IAI.TV (AUGUST 11, 2022)

    ....
    Last edited by revelarts; 08-29-2022 at 08:24 AM.
    It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
    Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God.
    1 Peter 2:16

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,219
    Thanks (Given)
    34615
    Thanks (Received)
    26690
    Likes (Given)
    2534
    Likes (Received)
    10166
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by revelarts View Post
    More bad news for the Big bang with the new cool space telescope.
    They Expected to see one thing but are seeing something else. (in science that's called a failed prediction)
    but they're still trying to shoehorn in some materialists explanations or make up theoretical rescue devices/excuses.

    All the galaxies LOOK OLD.... for a start (as stated in this thread before.)

    JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE SHOWS BIG BANG DIDN’T HAPPEN? WAIT…
    https://mindmatters.ai/2022/08/james...t-happen-wait/
    Physicist Eric J. Lerner comes to the point:
    To everyone who sees them, the new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of the cosmos are beautifully awe-inspiring. But to most professional astronomers and cosmologists, they are also extremely surprising—not at all what was predicted by theory. In the flood of technical astronomical papers published online since July 12, the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old. Lots of surprises, and not necessarily pleasant ones. One paper’s title begins with the candid exclamation: “Panic!”
    Why do the JWST’s images inspire panic among cosmologists? And what theory’s predictions are they contradicting? The papers don’t actually say. The truth that these papers don’t report is that the hypothesis that the JWST’s images are blatantly and repeatedly contradicting is the Big Bang Hypothesis that the universe began 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. Since that hypothesis has been defended for decades as unquestionable truth by the vast majority of cosmological theorists, the new data is causing these theorists to panic. “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning,” says Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, “and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.” [Update: Kirkpatrick has protested Lerner’s handling of this quotation. See Note below.]
    ERIC J. LERNER, “THE BIG BANG DIDN’T HAPPEN” AT IAI.TV (AUGUST 11, 2022)

    ....
    Wonder what they're surprised about? You mean something didn't just explode out of nothing? Who'd have though that

    Maybe they'll find something else they can sell to justify all that money on a telescope.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums