US scientists repeat fusion ignition breakthrough for 2nd time

[fj1200]

these facts point to the truth.

the ptb (powers that be) don't want enough energy.

they'd rather orchestrate an ELE (extinction level event) about the issue.

i'm here to administer your back door red pills for you.

Facts and you are not too well acquainted.

[AHZ]

Facts and you are not too well acquainted.

is the earth overpopulated with people?

[fj1200]

is the earth overpopulated with people?

No.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

No.

Go ask China that question or even India... as both are greatly, too far over populated . A FACT.--Tyr

[fj1200]

Go ask China that question or even India... as both are greatly, too far over populated . A FACT.--Tyr

There's a difference between fact and opinion. I'll put you down with Malthus and Ehrlich.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

There's a difference between fact and opinion. I'll put you down with Malthus and Ehrlich.

Aha, Malthus and Ehrlich will be so pleased that they are now in good company = ME! --Tyr

[AHZ]

Aha, Malthus and Ehrlich will be so pleased that they are now in good company = ME! --Tyr

im sorry thats nazi satanic bullcrap.

the earth is not overpopulated.

thats satan speaking.

there are some regional messes, but overall, the planet is capable.

the real problem is the elite are not willing, and prefer genocide, in the fog of their own power-obsessed madness.

[Gunny]

No.

Smoke and mirrors argument, depending on what numbers one uses.

If you take square mileage of the globe and divide it by population then it is not overpopulated.

If you take inhabitable areas and divide it by the population then it probably is.

If you take inhabited areas and divide it by the population it's disgustingly overpopulated.

If you take inhabited areas and match them against the ecological capacity to support, definitely overpopulated.

Just about anywhere there is are natural resources that support life on this planet there's a colony of Earthmen living like fireants.

[fj1200]

Smoke and mirrors argument, depending on what numbers one uses.

If you take square mileage of the globe and divide it by population then it is not overpopulated.

If you take inhabitable areas and divide it by the population then it probably is.

If you take inhabited areas and divide it by the population it's disgustingly overpopulated.

If you take inhabited areas and match them against the ecological capacity to support, definitely overpopulated.

Just about anywhere there is are natural resources that support life on this planet there's a colony of Earthmen living like fireants.

I believe in the ingenuity of man. Constant advancement has us feeding 8bb people in the world and besides global population is trending to peak at 10bbish between 2050 and 2100. And then decline. Plenty of countries and even continents are in decline already and the decline IMO is due to economic advancement.

I heard a stat awhile back that the entire population could live in TX, with a decent sized yard, leaving the rest of the globe for food production. I know you'll love your new neighbors.