The point to the thread from my porch is a situation and possible solution in a generalized manner. It is not an immediate fix, nor does it tie into current events. The method described in the videos is basically the creation of a bottom-up (grass roots) parallel society that over time overwhelms and chokes out a (semi)authoritarian one. It doesn't tear down original intent, law, nor construct; rather, replaces current cancer with healthy people.
I do not see any current candidate as especially qualified to have any position of power or leadership in such a scenario. Current neoliberals making comprising both parties generally support the system as it is. The system as it is is replacing written law and the ideal of America with itself.
Returning the Constitution of the United States as the law of the land guarantees freedom of religion. As far as candidates not talking about religion, I do not know of one that has not nor is that what anyone is saying. We're saying that law cannot be based on religion and appeal to a majority.
An example is: I want to accomplish all of the above, AND I'm going to base it on Southern Baptist Doctrine. No? You want it based on YOUR religion? I already read a good dose of what Kathianne thinks of Southern Baptists in another thread
. THIS never gets enough traction to roll downhill backward out of the driveway. It devolves into religious bickering immediately.
Using law instead of religion can sell across the board. Across the board is what one wishes to achieve when discussing mass movement.