"I repeatedly made the distinction that one cannot use "God" as a selling point to the segment of society that has all the same morals and rules but refuses to accept where they come from, and can wordsmith a logical argument without God. Why alienate or throw out otherwise good, productive people because they choose to follow their own religion or not? "
& I repeatedly made the distinction that you CAN NOT make/SELL
most of the same morals without the God of the Bible.
I repeatedly asked you and FJ to do it but you
never did.
What's the logical wordsmithed arguments against polygamy, homosexuality, and p0dos Gunny?
Why shouldn't someone steal or kill if it works for them, their family, neighborhood or city Gunny?
As you've pointed out, and we agree, not everyone has the same POV, religious or otherwise.
If you have (or can point to) the wordsmithed logical arguments to get society to align with what we both generally understand to be good morals for society, I'd be glad to embrace it with you.
But I'm not seeing that information coming from you. You just seem set on telling me NOT to be mention God or the Bible in a civil context, OR EVEN HISTORICAL context because "it wont work" or it alienates people, or worse it's "theocracy". (Theocracy when i say it, but not if a guy in a video says it somehow.
)
Funny thing is those that don't share our religious or moral views don't have a problem alienating us.
And telling us our views are wrong, hateful, outdated, and in some cases should even be outlawed to the point of the criminalizing even talking about them.
whether or not they are wordsmithed in or out of a religious framework.