Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,749
    Thanks (Given)
    24026
    Thanks (Received)
    17527
    Likes (Given)
    9761
    Likes (Received)
    6206
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default Do You Get The Rationale Here?

    I'm with the author, totally baffling and weirder than weird:

    https://hotair.com/tree-hugging-sist...ayers-n3788141

    Why Can't It Be Both: Is It CA Electricity 'Rate' or 'Raped' Payers?BEEGE WELBORN 2:40 PM | May 10, 2024



    Joe Johnston/The Tribune (of San Luis Obispo
    My hat's off to anyone who, like our John here, manages to remain IN California and retains their sanity.


    I have to admit, we were teary-eyed leaving after twelve years in SoCal in the early 90s. Being stationed there had been terrific for our little family - affordable being the very first word that comes to mind for living in a place with the best of everything within a couple of hours driving, be it beaches, mountains, fine dining, major sports, recreation opportunities, museums, tar pits, what have you.


    Watching from the East Coast, good grief - the changes seem to come like lightning. We feel doubly blessed now that we knew CA then.


    I've probably mentioned this in other posts before, but our Southern California Edison cost per kilowatt hour was 6.5¢ and never really increased, that I can remember. Granted, we had no air conditioning but it was still dirt cheap with ceiling fans, etc. Even more so when the first "compact" fluorescents came out, monster bulbs that they were. Natural gas bills from Pacific Gas and Electric (stove, water heater, and only turned the gas furnace on once in the twelve years) were negligible, and water was billed every other month - ran about $12.


    It was a good place to live.


    The anti-nuclear protests that would help change things were starting to heat up during our last year or so there, like 92-93.


    One truly fond memory to this day was on a local news report. Police were vainly trying to stuff a Diablo Canyon protester dressed as Shamu (Seaworld's killer whale) into the back of a CHiP patrol car. Damned 7-foot sumo-sized orca wouldn't fit, but cops gamely kept jamming as "Shamu" kept squawking for help.


    It was awesome.


    But the environuts won eventually, and the 11¢ kwh that I had at first choked on when we hit North Carolina? After a couple years, the extra nickel started looking like a bargain even when that ghastly heat pump was running.


    I couldn't believe what I would hear from friends still in Orange County. Dang. Someone lit a fire in paradise.


    Our electricity rates dropped significantly when we got to Pensacola, as did many other living expenses (for example, NC taxed food at the time - I believe they've evolved).


    CA, on the other hand, seems determined to dive off the deep end. They haven't stopped this dogged slog toward their own destruction.


    Other than a storm-induced burp, we never once worried about losing power. CA residents now live with constant uncertainty about their electrical power and are stuck paying ever more for ever less. Compared to the rest of the country, thanks to their climate lunacy, they were already paying through the nose.


    Insult to injury, in another truly incomprehensible decision yesterday, the people who use less electricity from an already fragile grid get to fork over additional money for the privilege of conserving.


    Makes perfect California sense, no?


    California regulators on Thursday voted to make it cheaper for people to charge electric cars and cool their homes in the summer, a decision heralded as part of the state's transition to clean energy but derided by others who warn it will raise prices for people who don't use as much energy.


    The California Public Utilities Commission voted to let the state's big investor-owned utilities - including Pacific Gas & Electric - add a fixed charge to people's power bills each month to pay for installing and maintaining the equipment necessary to transmit electricity to homes.






    "Well, hang on a second, yo!" you say. A line surcharge, as badly as they need that maintenance, does kind of make sense, right?


    And I'd agree...normally. But this is CA, so...it's all jacked up.


    State utility regulators decided today to let California’s largest power providers stick their customers with a new monthly flat fee in exchange for a reduction in the overall price of electricity, a controversial change to the way that millions of households pay their utility bills with weighty implications for state climate change policy.


    Under the new policy, utilities will be required to reduce the price households pay for the electricity they use every time they charge a phone or run an air conditioner. That rate cut will vary from between 8% and 18%, depending on the utility, season and time of day, according to the commission’s analysis.


    ...Starting in late 2025 for SCE and SDG&E customers and in early 2026 for those with PG&E, the state’s investor-owned utilities will be able to charge customers a monthly fee regardless of how much power the customer draws from the grid. So-called fixed charges are a mainstay of electric billing across most of the country, with an average fee of roughly $11.


    The new California charge will be $24 for most customers, but lower income households, who already qualify for discounted electric rates, will see fees of either $6 or $12.


    ...The reduced price of electricity will likely save money for people who use a lot of electricity, such as a large household in an AC-dependent part of the state or the owner of an electric SUV, a heat pump and an induction stove. That reduction will be more than enough to offset the cost of the new fee. Many, if not most, low-income households who qualify for the discounted fixed charge will also emerge as financial winners.


    But there are sure to be plenty of losers, too. Smaller households, Californians living along the temperate coast, energy conscious customers and people with solar panels on their rooftops are all more likely to see their total utility bills rise.


    CA is so Green they don't care how much juice you burn through anymore.


    GO AHEAD, KIDS - LEAVE EVERY LIGHT IN THE HOUSE ON




    Instead of simply adding the fee to their traditional pay-as-you-go usage rates? CA regulators saw fit to penalize the people who help keep the lights on when faulty and failing power generation capacity has the utilities scrambling and screaming for "conservation" or the lights go out.










    It's not as if CA regulators haven't already made CA electricity an unaffordable dream for some in the state, as shoddy as their delivery may be. Prior to this move yesterday, they'd already approved a PG&E rate hike. None of this helps things. Over a million PG&E customers were already delinquent on their utility bills.


    ...Unaffordable housing, high transportation and health care costs – it’s hard enough to get by in California without also worrying about cranking up the air, turning on the stove or simply keeping the lights on.


    But that’s what concerns many Pacific Gas & Electric Co. customers who cannot afford to pay their soaring utility bills. As of February, more than 1 million of them were behind on payments.


    The California Public Utilities Commission, tasked with regulating private utilities, just approved another rate hike last month, on top of a previous increase that took effect in January, amounting to a roughly $400 annual bump for the average household. The staggering energy costs have rocked residents and business owners, who are exasperated by the inability of state leaders and commissioners to ease their financial pain.


    With rates becoming increasingly unsustainable, the long-term repercussions for those already living paycheck to paycheck seem dire. More broadly, could these elevated costs serve as an impediment to wider adoption of all-electric vehicles and appliances? Will PG&E or the CPUC commissioners who approve these outrageous increases face any consequences?


    The utility’s negligence and aging infrastructure has led to loss of life, property and – in the case of Paradise – an entire California town. Nevertheless, consumers are paying the price for the consequences of their mistakes and the cost of preventing future ones.




    CA ratepayers were feeling physically abused and exploded on regulators months ago.


    ...“I’m a ratepayer for PG&E, but I feel more like a hostage,” said one speaker during the commission’s meeting. “How high are you going to allow our rates to get?”


    Another speaker, a Bay Area resident who said she was a nurse and mother of three, noted that commissioners could still approve additional rate increases for PG&E because of other pending proposals, and urged them to consider capping further rate hikes.


    “When is enough enough?” she said.


    BWAHAHAHAHA


    Commissioners and regulators sure fooled her! They approved all those rate increases, including yesterday's brilliant tactical maneuver.


    Oh, yes - and don't forget you're mandated to buy an EV sometime in the next couple of years, remember?






    What a hellhole.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
    Likes Gunny liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,168
    Thanks (Given)
    34544
    Thanks (Received)
    26643
    Likes (Given)
    2496
    Likes (Received)
    10127
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    I'm with the author, totally baffling and weirder than weird:

    https://hotair.com/tree-hugging-sist...ayers-n3788141
    I couldn't live on the CA economy as a civilian. Was okay as a Marine. Even then, it was the first time in 21 years I ever put in for base housing as a less expensive way to go.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  4. Thanks Kathianne thanked this post
    Likes Kathianne liked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,749
    Thanks (Given)
    24026
    Thanks (Received)
    17527
    Likes (Given)
    9761
    Likes (Received)
    6206
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I couldn't live on the CA economy as a civilian. Was okay as a Marine. Even then, it was the first time in 21 years I ever put in for base housing as a less expensive way to go.
    More, this is socialism in action:

    https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2024/05...r-not-n3788198

    Californi Will Make Everyone Pay For EVs Whether They Own One or NotJAZZ SHAW 1:00 PM | May 11, 2024



    AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta
    California Democrats are frustrated by many of their consumers. No matter how much they plead, whine, and cajole, people simply aren't buying electric vehicles in the numbers the state is demanding. And progress in getting charging stations up and running is far behind schedule. Also, all of the electrical power being flushed into these systems is expensive. But don't worry about any of that. Gavin Newsom and the Democrats have a plan to address all of these woes. In order to subsidize the cost of electric vehicles and encourage more people to buy them, they're going to tack on a monthly subsidy charge to everyone's utility bills. That's right... people who either don't want or can't afford an electric vehicle will be paying for the costs imposed by the minority of people who do. They will also be subsidizing conversions to electrical household appliances like stoves. (Free Beacon)


    Millions of middle-class California households are poised to pay an extra $24 per month for electricity, regardless of how much electricity they use. Regulators are hoping this utility billing policy will rescue their agenda to move everyone to electric cars and appliances by redistributing the massive costs of the state’s electric grid so utilities can lower their usage rates.


    But critics say the income-based premium will likely further hike utility costs for millions of Californians—nearly one-fifth of whom are already behind in paying their bills after household electricity rates almost doubled in the last decade—and likely won’t do much to cut the state’s sky-high electricity rates. The premiums are supposed to subsidize lower-income household electricity costs, which will be reduced by 5 cents to 7 cents per kilowatt hour, in a bid to make charging EVs and using electric heaters and appliances cheaper.


    Keep in mind that Californians already pay some of the highest monthly energy bills at an average rate of over $123. (Hawaii has the highest, while Utah is the lowest at $80.) California also has the highest average monthly water bills in the nation. So this $24 per month bump represents a 20 percent increase, putting them closer to stealing the title from Hawaii. Thanks to Joe Biden's massive inflation rates, the cost of everything has already skyrocketed, particularly energy. How much more of this will people put up with?


    Proponents are claiming that the extra costs will go toward reducing the cost of electricity for low-income households by a few cents per kilowatt-hour. But analysts aren't buying it, particularly when it comes to the state's mandate to do away with gas appliances and replace them with electric ones. The hourly cost will still be far higher than for natural gas stoves, just for one example.


    Not everyone will be paying this premium, but the cutoff rate is quite low. In order to avoid paying the monthly fee, your household will need to earn less than $62,150 per year. That's precious little for a state with a cost of living as high as California's. The current average household income in California is more than $130,000. So the only people avoiding the price hike will be earning less than half as much.


    All of this electrification is being pushed at a time when California's power grid is still existing on the edge during periods of high demand. This is particularly true during the summer when everyone's air conditioners are constantly running. They have continued to force coal and natural gas plants offline, attempting to replace them with wind and solar energy that costs more and is less reliable. The state's leadership has turned into a pack of lemmings in the name of climate change. The president of the state's utility commission said that the changes are "essential to transitioning us away from fossil fuels." The real question is what you're transitioning the state toward. From where I'm sitting, it looks like a catastrophe.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  6. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
    Likes Gunny liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums