What a bunch of clowns!

[jimnyc]

The scenario you posted about a person speaking at a podium with an unruly audience falls within what I posted.

That is correct. Your comment, although not 'exactly' what I was referring to, was indeed correct. I took my anger out on you because I'm used to talking to a simpleton throughout the day today. You have my apologies.

[truthmatters]

4

[Missileman]

That is correct. Your comment, although not 'exactly' what I was referring to, was indeed correct. I took my anger out on you because I'm used to talking to a simpleton throughout the day today. You have my apologies.

[jimnyc]

Do you also comprehend you have just spent a great deal of time arguing the merits of the KKK beating people up because they disagree with them?

It is just amazing to me how so many on this sight think that it is an exapmle of justice?

I guess this site is just special that way.

Again with the comprehension. I outright stated that if I were in the exact situation that I would have kicked some clown ass. It took you all day long to get my point?

I'm not defending the KKK. I'm merely stating that if someone wants to go out of their way to impede my freedom of speech, I will go out of my way to kick their asses.

And we KNOW you're "special", Ms. Shortbus candidate.

[jimnyc]

Right back at ya! I would give my left arm for a beer right now! I'd give ya my right one too but I still have "needs" that only that one can handle!

[truthmatters]

4

[Yurt]

Then again you amitt you disagree with the laws of this nation and its position on the rights of freedom of speech?

You see the law does not see two people speaking at once a an impedment of eithers speech

He "amitts" nothing

[Yurt]

Right back at ya! I would give my left arm for a beer right now! I'd give ya my right one too but I still have "needs" that only that one can handle!

You can handle it with only one?

[jimnyc]

Then again you amitt you disagree with the laws of this nation and its position on the rights of freedom of speech?

You see the law does not see two people speaking at once a an impedment of eithers speech

Amitt? impedment? eithers?

Try again, and this time use the other half of your brain.

[Pale Rider]

Your right I posted a story about the KKK physically attacking someone to try and shut down their freedom of speech.

This is it. This is why you can't see the "truth." YOUR clowns were the ones trying to "shut down free speech." So one of them got bitch slapped. They asked for it.

But you have just shown your hand to the rest of the board, as to how ass backwards your warped train of thought is.