*Irans Little Hitler Sounding Shaken: Wonders Now If USA Will Attack?*

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But Iran's *Littleman* is going down.
2. His days are numbered.
3. Everyone who is in *Reality*, knows he is capable to do what he has been saying.
4. And we knowing Islam is chucked full of blood thirsty killers, we have to react, before they act.
5. Blast the bloody buggers!

Regards,
SiramesofTexas

[glockmail]

Sorry bout that,

1. But Iran's *Littleman* is going down.
2. His days are numbered.
3. Everyone who is in *Reality*, knows he is capable to do what he has been saying.
4. And we knowing Islam is chucked full of blood thirsty killers, we have to react, before they act.
5. Blast the bloody buggers!

Regards,
SiramesofTexas

It will never happen, since America doesn't have the political will. It will take a nuke on US soil to get Liberals to agree to cruise-missle an aspirin factory or two.

[diuretic]

One of the problems for iranians is that they are terrorized. Recently 150,000 women were arrested for various charges mostly involving the islamic dress code. People are disappeared into the night for speaking out against the mullahs. Besides the main prison which is described as a hell hole, there are many other prisons throughout iran that are known locally, but nothing said about them, where people are tortured and killed.

The people are not happy but can't do anything about it. I suspect if we do invade iran it will be like Afghanistan. The people will rise up and take back their country.

I hate to sound really difficult but unless they themselves do something about it, leave them be is my view. That sounds very heartless I know but we know democracy can't be imposed.

[diuretic]

it's sure going to fuck up your theory if one of the bomber pilots was Jewish....or, God forbid, an agnostic!.....

It's only illustrative. I have no doubt that there were many people with different religions and no religions pulling the levers and flying the aircraft.

[diuretic]

the last thing they should be called is 'resistance' fighters.....at best they are revolutionaries, seeking to overturn the Iraqi government, at worst, they are merely blood sucking, murdering terrorists......

It's about perspective, that's all. Some will see them as resistance fighters, some as insurgents. We can label them how we wish, it doesn't change what they do, why they do it and what effect it has.

[jafar00]

The people are not happy but can't do anything about it. I suspect if we do invade iran it will be like Afghanistan. The people will rise up and take back their country.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the present government they have, a result of their last uprising against the installed Shah Pahlevi who terrorised them with an Iron Fist?

Don't make the mistake of comparing Iran to the other two countries you attacked. Invading them would only cause the Iranians to rally around their president and the Ayatullahs. Not the other way around.

[jimnyc]

I sometimes wonder if my posts are invisible to others, or if they just choose to cherry pick their responses and maybe my questions are too hard.

[glockmail]

I sometimes wonder if my posts are invisible to others, or if they just choose to cherry pick their responses and maybe my questions are too hard.

Stop asking libs substantiative questions then. They routinely deflect or ignore, and it shouldn't surprise you.

[jimnyc]

Stop asking libs substantiative questions then. They routinely deflect or ignore, and it shouldn't surprise you.

Jafar has read this thread a few times since my last reply to him but has continued to ignore it. That's ok though as I already knew the answers to my questions, I was just hoping to hear some more lies an innuendo to brighten my day along with my morning coffee.

[Gaffer]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the present government they have, a result of their last uprising against the installed Shah Pahlevi who terrorised them with an Iron Fist?

Don't make the mistake of comparing Iran to the other two countries you attacked. Invading them would only cause the Iranians to rally around their president and the Ayatullahs. Not the other way around.

The present government is a direct result of the mullahs taking over after the ouster of the shah by soviet supported upraising and carter backing. There was no terrorizing under the shah to the extent you claim. About 3000 people, mostly communists were arrested by him. In 1981 those 3000 and 30000 others were executed by the mullahs. The iranians learned all about the real iron fist when the mullahs took over.

The other two countries are being influenced by iran. al queda, the taliban, mahadi army are all supported by iran. iran wants control of the entire area. If we invade iran with an all out effort, the iranian military will be wiped out in three days. And the population will rise up to take their country back. There will then be a democracy or a Marxist government established.