Phony Soldiers, Phony Outrage, and Phony Patriotism

[truthmatters]

That is an outright lie because I and many others have articulated the problems we have with Bush countless times before when you have claimed we defend everything he does.

You on the other hand cant admit to a single thing he has done right. Maybe its about time you guys get over Florida 2000 and realize you guys lost. You couldnt steal the election. its over. Heck the administrations two terms are nearly over. Stop freaking attacking all the good that has gone on in this nation.

I HAVE NOT SEEN IT!

Prove I have seen it?

[Sir Evil]

I HAVE NOT SEEN IT!

Must of been the CIA manufacturing evidence again.

[truthmatters]

Psst Bush is a republican therefore we all suck.

I like RON PAUL and would even consider voting for him.

I would vote for an Ike in a red hot second!

The current Republican party is populated for the most part by neo cons who I would NEVER vote for.

[April15]

I HAVE NOT SEEN IT!

Nor I!

[Sir Evil]

Nor I!

SEARCH - it does a body good!


Howver go take a look at the post Jimnyc made in reference to the good news coming from Iraq, see how many of you had anything to say? zilch because the posts will result in little bashing opportunity.

[jimnyc]

I HAVE NOT SEEN IT!

Prove I have seen it?

Prove you saw something? LOL that's rich, why not just try opening your eyes and reading!

Nor I!

Not sure why you guys have so much trouble seeing these posts. I'm thinking the amount of hatred shown towards Bush keeps you guys from seeing the stuff the right disagrees with him on. There have been countless posts on the immigration issue alone in this very forum, at least hundreds of posts condemning the manner in which he's handled it.

[jimnyc]

SEARCH - it does a body good!


Howver go take a look at the post Jimnyc made in reference to the good news coming from Iraq, see how many of you had anything to say? zilch because the posts will result in little bashing opportunity.

Good catch!

I waste an hour of my time posting it at the recommendation of someone from the left and it basically went ignored, other than a few trying to impugn it as if it didn't exist.

That's ok with me though, my record here on the board debating the facts is nearly flawless.

[82Marine89]

Im glad to hear you see fault where fault is due ,I rarely hear that here. Its not an attempt at silence its an attempt at getting people to face the facts. What you call fairly means what? I talk about what I see he does as wrong. I speak out against people like Rush when I hear them saying what He said. If you would listen to the Full tape without a jaundiced eye you would realise he was refering to the soilder he had just hung up on who he called a phoney republican right on the phone to him. Its NOT false outrage it is OUTRAGE and REAL OUTRAGE at a jackass who never served himself calling people who served PHONYS because he does not like thier point of view. Its the same thing you do when you say MY outrage is phony. My outrage is perfectly real!

Fairly is when I give him credit for what he has done right and fault him for what he has done wrong. Some folks might say I judge him objectively.

With regards to Rush, I don't listen to him. I do find him to be a very smart person that can catch things faster than most of us, but I also don't like his diatribes and the fact he is a cheerleader for the Republican party. As for the soldier, I have my doubts about most people that start their phone calls with, "I served here..." or "I'm a conservative, but...", but since you went there, how do you feel about democrats that have never served attacking General Patraeus and other military men who agree with the POTUS? Should they keep their pie holes shut?

[Sir Evil]

Good catch!

I waste an hour of my time posting it at the recommendation of someone from the left and it basically went ignored, other than a few trying to impugn it as if it didn't exist.

That's ok with me though, my record here on the board debating the facts is nearly flawless.

Surprised? Nevermind, I already know the answer.

[stephanie]

The hate for President Bush is so over the top by liberals, they don't even see how they are the one's who is dividing this country...They really think they are the RIGHTIOUS ONES...But, it's us NORMAL folks who see them for what they are...Nuts...

Shoot I didn't like President Clinton, but at least I could find somethings that he did good....Ummm...just let me think on it.....

[truthmatters]

Fairly is when I give him credit for what he has done right and fault him for what he has done wrong. Some folks might say I judge him objectively.

With regards to Rush, I don't listen to him. I do find him to be a very smart person that can catch things faster than most of us, but I also don't like his diatribes and the fact he is a cheerleader for the Republican party. As for the soldier, I have my doubts about most people that start their phone calls with, "I served here..." or "I'm a conservative, but...", but since you went there, how do you feel about democrats that have never served attacking General Patraeus and other military men who agree with the POTUS? Should they keep their pie holes shut?

I was not all that keen on it but if he tailored his report in any way to benifit the Bush admin over the truth on the ground I would have to say he betrayed his country to some exstent. I would have not run the add if I was in the decision seat at Move on but they do have a right as Americans to say what they believe.There was a GAO report out at the same time that did not agree with Patraeus.

I dont listen to Rush either but I did listen to the UNCUT version of his show and it sure sounds like he is insulting the previous caller to any fair ear. Now if Rush was so sure he did not why did he only play the CUT version for his listeners to defend himself?

[82Marine89]

Shoot I didn't like President Clinton, but at least I could find somethings that he did good....Ummm...just let me think on it.....

Sorry bout this,

1. He spent a lot of time in the oval orifice.
2. He rose to the position numerous times.

Regards,
SirNotSoFunny

[82Marine89]

I was not all that keen on it but if he tailored his report in any way to benifit the Bush admin over the truth on the ground I would have to say he betrayed his country to some exstent. I would have not run the add if I was in the decision seat at Move on but they do have a right as Americans to say what they believe.There was a GAO report out at the same time that did not agree with Patraeus.

I dont listen to Rush either but I did listen to the UNCUT version of his show and it sure sounds like he is insulting the previous caller to any fair ear. Now if Rush was so sure he did not why did he only play the CUT version for his listeners to defend himself?

Why the double standard?

[truthmatters]

Rush has all the right in the world to say he thinks that Americans who fight in wars but dont agree with him are phoney soldiers. I have all the right to call him a dispicable human being for saying such horrible devisive bullshit. I never once called for him to be fired or anything. I just think hes a horrible person for doing so.

[82Marine89]

You don't get it do you? Why does MoveOn.org have the right to speak their mind, but not the author of this article?