Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    Since I haven't eaten beef, pork veal, or lamb for 17 years, can I get some carbon credits?


    Carbon credits are a useless nothing bought by the rich to make them feel better. This way they don't have to support radical environmental reform and put their oil company assets at risk.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In my knickers
    Posts
    31,029
    Thanks (Given)
    13927
    Thanks (Received)
    15358
    Likes (Given)
    4384
    Likes (Received)
    5487
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    Carbon credits are a useless nothing bought by the rich to make them feel better. This way they don't have to support radical environmental reform and put their oil company assets at risk.
    After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown

    “Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
    -Abbey

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    And unfortunately, the only people that can fix it - the voters - have been brainwashed by Exxon fronts into believing their isn't a consensus on global warming.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The great white north
    Posts
    5,718
    Thanks (Given)
    455
    Thanks (Received)
    1144
    Likes (Given)
    11
    Likes (Received)
    19
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2334310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    Based on what evidence?
    You want evidence that there used to be an huge buffalo herd????????????

    As for my other statement, it's an oppinion. Based on the fact that the world has gone through climate changes in the past. I don't usually site wikipedia as a source but it's an easy one and I have to leave in a minute.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trigg View Post
    You want evidence that there used to be an huge buffalo herd????????????
    No, I want evidence that neither cow nor buffalo cause global warming.

    As for my other statement, it's an oppinion. Based on the fact that the world has gone through climate changes in the past. I don't usually site wikipedia as a source but it's an easy one and I have to leave in a minute.
    How does the fact that the earth has undergone climate change in the past lead you to conclude that the methane that cows and buffalo produce does not trap infrared radiation?

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The great white north
    Posts
    5,718
    Thanks (Given)
    455
    Thanks (Received)
    1144
    Likes (Given)
    11
    Likes (Received)
    19
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2334310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    No, I want evidence that neither cow nor buffalo cause global warming.



    How does the fact that the earth has undergone climate change in the past lead you to conclude that the methane that cows and buffalo produce does not trap infrared radiation?
    Did I say that, let me check.....................nope. Just as I thought that isn't what I said.

    I said I doubt they have anything to do with global warming. Do they produce methane yep, no argument. Getting rid of cows ignores the fact that other animals used to be more numerous (Buffalo) and no one was blaiming them for global warming. Blaiming humans because we eat meat is just assinine.

    I happen to think that because the earth has gone through periods of extreme heat/cold/drought before that it will again. Do we contribute to the changes maybe we do, but I don't believe it is significant.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    946
    Thanks (Given)
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    13
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    35832

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trigg View Post
    You want evidence that there used to be an huge buffalo herd????????????

    As for my other statement, it's an oppinion. Based on the fact that the world has gone through climate changes in the past. I don't usually site wikipedia as a source but it's an easy one and I have to leave in a minute.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
    yes certain studies show that weather conditions as drastic as we are seeing go back a long way ( wiil that be any comfort when the shit hits ? )but statisticly we are throwing out enourmous amounts of emmisions id rather lean on the safe side our generation probably wont feel the biggest brunt of it but our kids and grand kids will be left a nice legacy from us

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trigg View Post
    Did I say that, let me check.....................nope. Just as I thought that isn't what I said.

    I said I doubt they have anything to do with global warming. Do they produce methane yep, no argument. Getting rid of cows ignores the fact that other animals used to be more numerous (Buffalo) and no one was blaiming them for global warming. Blaiming humans because we eat meat is just assinine.
    What you are saying is only true for America. There are 1.3 billion head of cattle in the world, only 100 million in America, and there were 60-100 million head of buffalo before we slaughtered them all. I'm still not seeing how this proves that methane from a cow or buffalo's anus doesn't contribute to global warming.


    I happen to think that because the earth has gone through periods of extreme heat/cold/drought before that it will again. [/QUPTE]

    And no one would disagree with you on that point, so why do you keep bringing it up?

    [QUOTE}Do we contribute to the changes maybe we do, but I don't believe it is significant.
    Based on what evidence? What journal, volume, and page number? If not that, then what expertise do you have that qualifies you to comment without reference to any papers?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums