Originally Posted by
LiberalNation
No more terrorist under Bush than Clinton = Bush not dealing with it well. If it's a fight against terrorist you want to stop the terrorists not make more of them. If there is fewer terrorist under Bush than clinton then same thing, Bush would be doing the better job.
well....clinton did nothing and bush attacked two countries.....as for the relative number of terrorists.....there are probaly fewer now because bush has been killing them....
"I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is."
~Albert Camus