Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Temecula, California
    Posts
    2,413
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14060

    Default Is Christian Tolerance Tolerable Anymore?

    Intolerance may be one of the most serious charges in America today. It seems to carry much emotional firepower without requiring much evidence. And it often seems the greatest offenders are Christians. Our modern code of “tolerance” has been the public’s answer to those who differed from them, yet the church’s understanding of moral truth often offends the “do your own thing” crowd.

    Tolerance means respecting to the beliefs and practices of others, and learning to live peacefully with what we believe to be wrong. We are not tolerant of something unless we first object to it. Tolerance allows for the free flow of ideas. It assumes that all points of view will be fairly considered, even when they may not be popular. A person does not tolerate something they are indifferent to, because it requires nothing of them.

    “Tolerance” can be harmful when it becomes a tired response for indifferent neutrality to every moral issue. It can be the virtue of people who believe in nothing. Today, “tolerance” has made passing judgment unfashionable on many attitudes and behaviors.

    To avoid judgment is not to be sensitive or tolerant. It is to avoid responsibility. Teachers judge the work of their students, and students the work of their teachers. Parents judge their children’s study and viewing habits, and their friends. Without judgment there can be no standards or rules to govern behavior. We see the human cost every day in our urban streets, drug rehabilitation centers, emergency rooms, crisis pregnancy centers, and divorce courts. It is defended by the call for “tolerance.”

    We need to distinguish between diverse and tolerant attitudes, and morally bankrupt ones that can’t call depravity for what it is. The real issue is not whether we are tolerant, but what we are tolerant of. Modern “victims” often position themselves against Christianity, when the Gospel ironically created what makes their movement possible when Jesus took the side of the victim.

    As Christians, we know that God hates sin, but is he tolerant of it? And how should we be? Many portray God as morally uncompromising, and sure to punish evil. But he is also portrayed as patient, and slow to anger. It seems he does tolerate sin, at least for while.

    Perhaps the most illustrative story about God’s attitude toward tolerance is the story of Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. The religious leaders brought her to him as a trap. Either Jesus would deny the law and lose his authority as a moral teacher, or he would agree to condemn the woman and lose the sympathy of the people. He surprisingly does neither. Jesus tells them the one who is without sin should cast the first stone. He tells the woman he does not condemn her. Then, he critically says what no politically correct activist today would say, “Go and sin no more.”

    Click for full text...
    POLITICAL ACTIVISTS CREED
    "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires in people's minds" -Samuel Adams

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men
    stand ready to do violence on their behalf."~George Orwell

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    7,727
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    243667

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 82Marine89 View Post
    Intolerance may be one of the most serious charges in America today. It seems to carry much emotional firepower without requiring much evidence. And it often seems the greatest offenders are Christians. Our modern code of “tolerance” has been the public’s answer to those who differed from them, yet the church’s understanding of moral truth often offends the “do your own thing” crowd.

    Tolerance means respecting to the beliefs and practices of others, and learning to live peacefully with what we believe to be wrong. We are not tolerant of something unless we first object to it. Tolerance allows for the free flow of ideas. It assumes that all points of view will be fairly considered, even when they may not be popular. A person does not tolerate something they are indifferent to, because it requires nothing of them.

    “Tolerance” can be harmful when it becomes a tired response for indifferent neutrality to every moral issue. It can be the virtue of people who believe in nothing. Today, “tolerance” has made passing judgment unfashionable on many attitudes and behaviors.

    To avoid judgment is not to be sensitive or tolerant. It is to avoid responsibility. Teachers judge the work of their students, and students the work of their teachers. Parents judge their children’s study and viewing habits, and their friends. Without judgment there can be no standards or rules to govern behavior. We see the human cost every day in our urban streets, drug rehabilitation centers, emergency rooms, crisis pregnancy centers, and divorce courts. It is defended by the call for “tolerance.”

    We need to distinguish between diverse and tolerant attitudes, and morally bankrupt ones that can’t call depravity for what it is. The real issue is not whether we are tolerant, but what we are tolerant of. Modern “victims” often position themselves against Christianity, when the Gospel ironically created what makes their movement possible when Jesus took the side of the victim.

    As Christians, we know that God hates sin, but is he tolerant of it? And how should we be? Many portray God as morally uncompromising, and sure to punish evil. But he is also portrayed as patient, and slow to anger. It seems he does tolerate sin, at least for while.

    Perhaps the most illustrative story about God’s attitude toward tolerance is the story of Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. The religious leaders brought her to him as a trap. Either Jesus would deny the law and lose his authority as a moral teacher, or he would agree to condemn the woman and lose the sympathy of the people. He surprisingly does neither. Jesus tells them the one who is without sin should cast the first stone. He tells the woman he does not condemn her. Then, he critically says what no politically correct activist today would say, “Go and sin no more.”

    Click for full text...
    Interesting--I think the point that sinning (making bad moral judgement causing harm to yourself or others) is tolerated by God for awhile is a valid one. Unfortunately the only consequence we are given for continued sinning without repentence seems to be an eternity in hell. Are people just willing to suffer the earthly consequences of sinning and hoping there is no God and therefor no eternal punishment ?

    A nutcase will do nutty things.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    9,768
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    16
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    515532

    Default

    outstanding, one of the most well thought out threads ive ever read



    Quote Originally Posted by 82Marine89 View Post
    Intolerance may be one of the most serious charges in America today. It seems to carry much emotional firepower without requiring much evidence. And it often seems the greatest offenders are Christians. Our modern code of “tolerance” has been the public’s answer to those who differed from them, yet the church’s understanding of moral truth often offends the “do your own thing” crowd.

    Tolerance means respecting to the beliefs and practices of others, and learning to live peacefully with what we believe to be wrong. We are not tolerant of something unless we first object to it. Tolerance allows for the free flow of ideas. It assumes that all points of view will be fairly considered, even when they may not be popular. A person does not tolerate something they are indifferent to, because it requires nothing of them.

    “Tolerance” can be harmful when it becomes a tired response for indifferent neutrality to every moral issue. It can be the virtue of people who believe in nothing. Today, “tolerance” has made passing judgment unfashionable on many attitudes and behaviors.

    To avoid judgment is not to be sensitive or tolerant. It is to avoid responsibility. Teachers judge the work of their students, and students the work of their teachers. Parents judge their children’s study and viewing habits, and their friends. Without judgment there can be no standards or rules to govern behavior. We see the human cost every day in our urban streets, drug rehabilitation centers, emergency rooms, crisis pregnancy centers, and divorce courts. It is defended by the call for “tolerance.”

    We need to distinguish between diverse and tolerant attitudes, and morally bankrupt ones that can’t call depravity for what it is. The real issue is not whether we are tolerant, but what we are tolerant of. Modern “victims” often position themselves against Christianity, when the Gospel ironically created what makes their movement possible when Jesus took the side of the victim.

    As Christians, we know that God hates sin, but is he tolerant of it? And how should we be? Many portray God as morally uncompromising, and sure to punish evil. But he is also portrayed as patient, and slow to anger. It seems he does tolerate sin, at least for while.

    Perhaps the most illustrative story about God’s attitude toward tolerance is the story of Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. The religious leaders brought her to him as a trap. Either Jesus would deny the law and lose his authority as a moral teacher, or he would agree to condemn the woman and lose the sympathy of the people. He surprisingly does neither. Jesus tells them the one who is without sin should cast the first stone. He tells the woman he does not condemn her. Then, he critically says what no politically correct activist today would say, “Go and sin no more.”

    Click for full text...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Burlingame,California
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Intolerance of others ideas or religion is just a precurser to revolution.
    A chance for a new beginning, like a dawn of reconciliation.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    7,727
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    243667

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by April15 View Post
    Intolerance of others ideas or religion is just a precurser to revolution.
    naaaaa---you can be intolerant and never act on it.

    A nutcase will do nutty things.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    9,768
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    16
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    515532

    Default

    the article you found online and posted here was so well written that it inspired me to make my own thread, in my own words about a similar subject

    http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=12250

    Quote Originally Posted by 82Marine89 View Post
    Intolerance may be one of the most serious charges in America today. It seems to carry much emotional firepower without requiring much evidence. And it often seems the greatest offenders are Christians. Our modern code of “tolerance” has been the public’s answer to those who differed from them, yet the church’s understanding of moral truth often offends the “do your own thing” crowd.

    Tolerance means respecting to the beliefs and practices of others, and learning to live peacefully with what we believe to be wrong. We are not tolerant of something unless we first object to it. Tolerance allows for the free flow of ideas. It assumes that all points of view will be fairly considered, even when they may not be popular. A person does not tolerate something they are indifferent to, because it requires nothing of them.

    “Tolerance” can be harmful when it becomes a tired response for indifferent neutrality to every moral issue. It can be the virtue of people who believe in nothing. Today, “tolerance” has made passing judgment unfashionable on many attitudes and behaviors.

    To avoid judgment is not to be sensitive or tolerant. It is to avoid responsibility. Teachers judge the work of their students, and students the work of their teachers. Parents judge their children’s study and viewing habits, and their friends. Without judgment there can be no standards or rules to govern behavior. We see the human cost every day in our urban streets, drug rehabilitation centers, emergency rooms, crisis pregnancy centers, and divorce courts. It is defended by the call for “tolerance.”

    We need to distinguish between diverse and tolerant attitudes, and morally bankrupt ones that can’t call depravity for what it is. The real issue is not whether we are tolerant, but what we are tolerant of. Modern “victims” often position themselves against Christianity, when the Gospel ironically created what makes their movement possible when Jesus took the side of the victim.

    As Christians, we know that God hates sin, but is he tolerant of it? And how should we be? Many portray God as morally uncompromising, and sure to punish evil. But he is also portrayed as patient, and slow to anger. It seems he does tolerate sin, at least for while.

    Perhaps the most illustrative story about God’s attitude toward tolerance is the story of Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. The religious leaders brought her to him as a trap. Either Jesus would deny the law and lose his authority as a moral teacher, or he would agree to condemn the woman and lose the sympathy of the people. He surprisingly does neither. Jesus tells them the one who is without sin should cast the first stone. He tells the woman he does not condemn her. Then, he critically says what no politically correct activist today would say, “Go and sin no more.”

    Click for full text...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by April15 View Post
    Intolerance of others ideas or religion is just a precurser to revolution.
    So the left is preparing a revolution? Why exactly?
    If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin

    Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Burlingame,California
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    So the left is preparing a revolution? Why exactly?
    It could be the religious are the ones conspiring.
    A chance for a new beginning, like a dawn of reconciliation.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1969

    Default

    That was good. I read the references to judgement and it occurred to me that "judgement" and its offsider "discrimination" have been given a bum rap lately. I mean, the term "judgemental" has turned into a pejorative as in, "he's a really judgemental type", which is usually said in a disapproving tone.

    But judgement and discrimination are really neutral. They're just mental tools. It's what fuels them that's important.

    The guide for judgement and for tolerance shouldn't be religion, that way lies the theocracy but I sense that's what the writer is urging, using Christian values (as he sees them at least) as the touchstone for judgement and tolerance. Where secular values - eg the law - are the basis for judgement and tolerance then we all know where we stand. The advantage of secular values and in particular as they're embedded in the law is that they are arrived at by consensus. Religious values are arrived at by various means, depending on the religion and whichever is the dominant denomination.

    It seems to me that the writer is calling for Christian values to prevail over secular values. If that's the case then my intolerance for that view will get a workout.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,762
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306086

    Default

    This thread is getting difficult to tolerate.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    This thread is getting difficult to tolerate.

    And even more difficult to ignore
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums