Results 1 to 15 of 38

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    9,768
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    16
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    515527

    Default

    Look at these liberals faggots: they want to force christians and anyone who doesnt agree with them to violate their religious beliefs and personal convictions just to appease them again this is what i mean when i say the cultural left wants to intellectual rape people who dont agree with them

    Quote Originally Posted by stephanie View Post
    By Pete Vere
    February 25, 2008
    An evangelical Christian photographer was brought before the New Mexico Human Rights Commission after she declined for religious reasons to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony.

    When Elaine Huguenin of Albuquerque, N.M., declined in September 2006 an e-mail request from a lesbian couple to photograph their ceremony, one of the lesbians responded by lodging a human rights complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Division, the state agency charged with enforcing state anti-discrimination laws and sending cases to the commission to be adjudicated.

    Vanessa Willock sought an injunction to prohibit Mrs. Huguenin and her business, Elane Photography, from declining any future request to photograph a same-sex ceremony. The agency agreed to hear Miss Willock's complaint, the latest case brought before tribunals in the U.S. and Canada that free-speech advocates say threaten expression across North America.

    read the rest..
    http://washingtontimes.com/article/2...256068479/1015

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    58692

    Default

    hey if abu can refuse to sell bacon at his quickie mart or let people in his taxi with booze....then a christian can refuse to take pictures of sin...

    "I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is."

    ~Albert Camus

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    9,768
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    16
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    515527

    Default

    fine with me.

    Quote Originally Posted by manu1959 View Post
    hey if abu can refuse to sell bacon at his quickie mart or let people in his taxi with booze....then a christian can refuse to take pictures of sin...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    9,768
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    16
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    515527

    Default

    fine with me.

    You dont like how i run my cab, store, or company, get the fuck out and stop whining like a little bitch, cause i didnt kiss your carpet munching ass

    Quote Originally Posted by manu1959 View Post
    hey if abu can refuse to sell bacon at his quickie mart or let people in his taxi with booze....then a christian can refuse to take pictures of sin...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1964

    Default

    I think scalps can go back where they belong - it hasn't been decided yet has it?
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    I think scalps can go back where they belong - it hasn't been decided yet has it?
    it shouldn't have to be. A person should be allowed to turn down business if they don't want it.
    If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin

    Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1964

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    it shouldn't have to be. A person should be allowed to turn down business if they don't want it.
    That's fine as a normative statement. But since this case is before some sort of tribunal and it will be decided with reference to the law as it exists then the law will take its course. That was my point.

    I agree a larger point is whether or not someone who offers goods and/or services to the general public should be permitted to refuse to supply goods and/or service to individuals based on a personal belief system. I understand the competing ideas contained in that situation and frankly I'm in two minds about it. I'd be interested to read the arguments.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    That's fine as a normative statement. But since this case is before some sort of tribunal and it will be decided with reference to the law as it exists then the law will take its course. That was my point.

    I agree a larger point is whether or not someone who offers goods and/or services to the general public should be permitted to refuse to supply goods and/or service to individuals based on a personal belief system. I understand the competing ideas contained in that situation and frankly I'm in two minds about it. I'd be interested to read the arguments.
    and my point, and the point of others, is it is completely ridiculous to bring it before a tribunal. People have the freedom to not associate or do business with others if they so choose. And forcing them to is paramount to slavery.

    This is also a clear illustration of why gay marriage, or even civil unions, should not be sanctioned. Because the purpose of sanctioning them isn't to be together. It's to have some basis of law to persecute those who don't agree with them. Mark my words, if gay marriage is ever passed, you will see every person who dares speak out against it persecuted.
    If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin

    Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums