Page 28 of 51 FirstFirst ... 18262728293038 ... LastLast
Results 406 to 420 of 754
  1. #406
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Sorry, gm. As far as I know the confederate flag can still be displayed and flown anywhere and anytime. Now, what "right" have you won, again?

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    We won the right not to have the Confederate battle flag flown in our states. If y'all want to use it for history lessons and such fine, but let's remember the entire history.
    But, to clarify, I think flying it in your yard or in the rear window of your vehicle is just ignorant and asking for trouble. And if you insist on it's representation on your state flagpole I think you are the most ignorant.

  2. #407
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    We won the right not to have the Confederat battle flag flown in our states. If y'all want to use it for history lessons and such fine, but let's remember the entire history.
    Actually, no, what you "won" was the privilege not to live under the Stars and Bars. There are no laws banning the flying of any Confederate flag, nor should there be.
    Last edited by 5stringJeff; 03-15-2008 at 01:58 PM.

  3. #408
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,237
    Thanks (Given)
    34626
    Thanks (Received)
    26699
    Likes (Given)
    2540
    Likes (Received)
    10173
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    It is also well documented that political power was concentrated with rich farm families who inherited their wealth from their English ancestors who occupied most of the fertile bottom lands. In NC this may have been 1000 or so families. We German-Americans and Scots-Irish-Americans who emigrated later and got forced into the less fertile Piedmont and Mountain regions didn't own slaves and didn't support sucession. In fact many of us fought for the Union.

    We won the right not to have the Confederat battle flag flown in our states. If y'all want to use it for history lessons and such fine, but let's remember the entire history.
    Let's. My ancestry is Scot and to a man they all fought for the right to not have a bunch of carpetbaggers telling them what they could and could not do in their own yards, and none of those sidehill farmers could afford slaves.

    It is also well-document that Northern power was concentrated among a monority of wealthy industrialists whose sole aim was to control the South's wealth and feed their bottomless pit factories on the cheap or for free by taking what they did not wish to pay for.

    Anyone that believes the US Civil War was about anything more than greed, money and power at its base is swallowing the party line rather than looking at the actual truth.

    Blacks and apologists have villified the Confederate Battle Flag because they don't like anything that disagrees with their distorted, fanciful version of American history.

    You didn't win any right to do anything. You caved to political correctness and revisionist history.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  4. #409
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Way ahead of you
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Anyone that believes the US Civil War was about anything more than greed, money and power at its base is swallowing the party line rather than looking at the actual truth.
    Just like Gulf Wars I and II.
    If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.

  5. #410
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,237
    Thanks (Given)
    34626
    Thanks (Received)
    26699
    Likes (Given)
    2540
    Likes (Received)
    10173
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by typomaniac View Post
    Just like Gulf Wars I and II.
    Please name a war in history that has not been based on one or all the three.

    The First Gulf War was a direct result of Saddam's greed and sociopathic quest for money and power.

    The second is a continuation of the first.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  6. #411
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Way ahead of you
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Please name a war in history that has not been based on one or all the three.

    The First Gulf War was a direct result of Saddam's greed and sociopathic quest for money and power.

    The second is a continuation of the first.
    I'm glad you at least agree that it's not about "freedom" or "fighting the terrorists over there so that they don't come here."
    If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.

  7. #412
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,237
    Thanks (Given)
    34626
    Thanks (Received)
    26699
    Likes (Given)
    2540
    Likes (Received)
    10173
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by typomaniac View Post
    I'm glad you at least agree that it's not about "freedom" or "fighting the terrorists over there so that they don't come here."
    I would say that is subjective to individual idealism. Liberating Kuwait was indeed about freedom from Saddam Hussein's military occupation and rape of a sovereign nation.

    Fighting an enemy in HIS yard instead of your own is sound logic if you don't want YOUR stuff torn up. 9/11 was a direct result of the "they're way over there" mentality.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  8. #413
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    9,768
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    16
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    515527

    Default

    political correctness rules the day, sadly

    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbit View Post
    Since I've seen so many discussions on the Confederate flag, I've decided to give one southerner's view on the whole thing.

    First off is the Confederacy itself. Yes, the Confederacy allowed slavery throughout its borders, and that was wrong. To be fair, though, four Union states still allowed slavery, and those were Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and Delaware. In the Union, racism was still rampant, and a free black in the South enjoyed more liberties than a black in the North. The Confederacy, rather, was formed over states' rights. The South felt that the more populous Northern states were using their legislative power to overstep the Constitution and impose their will on the South. With Northern industry heavily dependant on Southern agriculture combined with Northern condescension towards Southerners, who they thought to be stupid (sound familiar), this was probably true.

    The War Between the States. When the war started, it was in response to the Union leaving a fort (Fort Sumpter) manned, despite the fact that the land it was built on was still owned by the state of South Carolina, which had seceded from the Union. Although no person was killed in the assault on either side, Lincoln moved an army into the South, which was routed at Manassas (not Bull Run, Yankee retards. Manassas was where it happened. Bull Run was the nearest river). The Southerners fought valiantly to try to save their new nation, and outfought the Union on every battlefield, but the Union had more men and resources. Knowing that the world depended on their cotton crop, the Confederacy appealed to Great Britain and France for help (France was still worth talking to for help right up until they sunk all that money into the Maginot Line in the 20s and 30s). Britain hesitated, and France awaited Britain's answer.

    The war was not about slavery. Yes, you heard that right. Slavery was far from the issue. In fact, despite the hype behind the (admirable) unit portrayed in the movie "Glory," that unit did not contain America's first black soldiers. Although Confederate military records were destroyed after the war (many think to cover up this fact), photographic and mail evidence clearly show that many Confederate units were mixed, with between 30,000 and 100,000 black soldiers fighting for the South, many in exchange for emancipation. With the war already going badly and appearing long and costly, Lincoln feared France and Britain entering the war, as they would force the Union to accept the Confederacy as an independant nation. To this end, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. It was nothing more than a speech, and did not affect any slaves in the four Union slave states. However, Britain was a strongly abolitionist nation and, for appearance's sake, kept out of the war, as did France. In fact, General Ulysses S. Grant owned his own slaves until the 13th ammendment passed in 1865.

    Following the war, Lincoln was willing to welcome back the Confederacy and get back to business as usual, with no penalties for former Confederates. He wanted the bloody business done and behind us, but before he could implement his plan, he was assassinated. His successors did not have such a merciful view. They were so forceful in freeing the slaves that many of them ended up starving on the streets, unable to return to their former masters for work. In addition to this, many Northern politicians created puppet governments through uneducated blacks, who now controlled most of the Southern vote. To protect the interests of the Southern states, the KKK was formed to combat the influence of Northern puppetteers and 'carpetbaggers,' so named for the luggage they carried, which was made from old carpet.

    When the KKK formed, they were not racist in primary purpose, but were rather political. However, it did not take long for the goals of the KKK as a shadow political party to be hijacked by the many racists who had climbed to power in the organization. With their popularity declining, they adopted the symbol of the Confederacy, claiming they carried its legacy. Despite this, the KKK was eventually dissolved, mostly due to new laws designed specifically to bring it down. In the early 20th century, a new movie entitled "The Klansman" opened in theaters. This fictionalized version of the founding of the KKK protrayed all blacks and idiots and the KKK as being the only thing standing between white women and black rapists. It also caused the revival of the Klan, which took on not only the Confederacy, but adopted Christianity (specifically Protestantism) as another symbol, not because of religious endorsement, but to increase their popularity among the protestant majority of the South. Although it has died down from the pre-civil rights days of lynchings and partial political control of the South, the KKK still exists as a racist organization, now expanding further in its goals to take out not only blacks, but Jews, Mexicans, Asians, and even Catholics.

    It is also worth noting that with few exceptions, the South integrated more swiftly and with less conflict than the North.

    Now to the Confederate flag. The Confederate flag is the flag of a fallen nation. That nation fought for the rights of the states to be free from a federal government controlled by industrialists. Many of us (Southerners) have ancestors who fought for that nation, and we will not be ashamed. However, black race-baiters feed off of conflict, and portraying the South as the cause of all black problems is far easier than telling them what really happened and trying to move on. The fact that the KKK has also soiled our blessed flags in their dogmatic idiocy has not helped matters. However, given the true history of the Confederacy and the flag that the KKK adopted, it is clear that the Confederate flag is no more racist than the cross, another symbol adopted by the KKK. What needs to happen is not the politically motivated suppression of a historical symbol, but rather an abandonment of the attack on all things associated with the Confederate nation. The Confederacy is long dead, and its a horse that has been beaten for nearly 150 years, post mortem.

    I, personally, have a full set of Confederate flags in my room, but they will never fly higher than the American flag also in my room, and I will never toss them aside just because some black guy doesn't want to be reminded of the country on which he blames all of his problems.

  9. #414
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Way ahead of you
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I would say that is subjective to individual idealism. Liberating Kuwait was indeed about freedom from Saddam Hussein's military occupation and rape of a sovereign nation.
    About which the U.S. wouldn't have given two shits if not for its oil deposits.

    Fighting an enemy in HIS yard instead of your own is sound logic if you don't want YOUR stuff torn up. 9/11 was a direct result of the "they're way over there" mentality.
    Wrong, G: 9/11 was a direct result of greed on the part of American Airlines and UAL.
    If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.

  10. #415
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Georgia!
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks (Given)
    738
    Thanks (Received)
    673
    Likes (Given)
    1133
    Likes (Received)
    828
    Piss Off (Given)
    24
    Piss Off (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1203903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by typomaniac View Post
    About which the U.S. wouldn't have given two shits if not for its oil deposits.


    Wrong, G: 9/11 was a direct result of greed on the part of American Airlines and UAL.
    Huh? How?
    UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION

    Above the Best

    Why the Hell should I have to press “1” for ENGLISH?

  11. #416
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Way ahead of you
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. P View Post
    Huh? How?
    Being too cheap to pay for trained inflight security. Quite stupid considering how many millions each of their planes costs.
    If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.

  12. #417
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,237
    Thanks (Given)
    34626
    Thanks (Received)
    26699
    Likes (Given)
    2540
    Likes (Received)
    10173
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by typomaniac View Post
    About which the U.S. wouldn't have given two shits if not for its oil deposits.
    Perhaps. Self-interest pretty-much makes everyone's decisions for them at every level from individual to National.

    At the same time, we are capable of and have performed selfless acts in the past just because it was the right thing to do.

    Wrong, G: 9/11 was a direct result of greed on the part of American Airlines and UAL
    Not sure where THIS little theory comes from. My point is, we are not untouchable to anyone who TRULY wants to attack us. Halfway around the world is no longer a deterrent in this day and age ... it's merely an inconvenience. A handful of backwards-assed, 7th century minds proved that.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  13. #418
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Way ahead of you
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Not sure where THIS little theory comes from. My point is, we are not untouchable to anyone who TRULY wants to attack us. Halfway around the world is no longer a deterrent in this day and age ... it's merely an inconvenience. A handful of backwards-assed, 7th century minds proved that.
    See post #416. But I get your point, and for the most part I agree.

    However, just because a handful of backwards-assed, 7th-century minds halfway around the world can try to touch us does not at all mean that we can't make it impossible for them to do any significant damage.
    If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.

  14. #419
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,237
    Thanks (Given)
    34626
    Thanks (Received)
    26699
    Likes (Given)
    2540
    Likes (Received)
    10173
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by typomaniac View Post
    See post #416. But I get your point, and for the most part I agree.

    However, just because a handful of backwards-assed, 7th-century minds halfway around the world can try to touch us does not at all mean that we can't make it impossible for them to do any significant damage.
    The fact that we live in an open, free society and can't even control our own borders pretty-much means we can't make it impossible for them to attack us. The attacker always has the advantage of knowing what and when and how he is going to strike. All we can do is react.

    And where do we draw the line in sacrificing freedom for security. The two are pretty much mutually exclusive. You have to give up one to gain the other.

    We demand our government protect us; yet, oppose allowing it the tools necessary to do so.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  15. #420
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Way ahead of you
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    The fact that we live in an open, free society and can't even control our own borders pretty-much means we can't make it impossible for them to attack us. The attacker always has the advantage of knowing what and when and how he is going to strike. All we can do is react.

    And where do we draw the line in sacrificing freedom for security. The two are pretty much mutually exclusive. You have to give up one to gain the other.

    We demand our government protect us; yet, oppose allowing it the tools necessary to do so.
    I'd say our government already has the necessary tools to do so: it's the globalists and advocates of cheap labor who oppose allowing the government to use them. We could easily control our borders if our politicians didn't feel the need to accept legalized bribes from these people.

    As far as the freedom issue goes, Israel has nearly the same level of civil liberties (for its Jews at least) as the U.S. And they're obviously more secure. They have to be in order to just survive.
    If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums