You are right, but you think its productive to call me an imbecile because I made one mistake? Ha, shows how desperate you are.
I should have said they have the privledge to marry. My mistake, but when the lie is repeated often enough, its easy to repeat it.
I use to think 10 percent of the population was homo, and I helped spread that lie...
and there is a host of other examples.
So, the homo fags have been given the same privledge as everyone else. And frankly, Im glad you pointed out my error so that I shant go on repeating as I most surely would have.
Where exactly, is that in the Constitution>?
Some cultures dont even have marriage as we have it.
Human rights should not be able to be taken away by the govt, if the person, persons involved have done nothing to cause its removal.
Why dont I have the right to marry TWO WOMEN? or my dog, or my daughter?
Quote:
Originally Posted by manu1959
not worried in the least.....btw how are gays planning to maintain their species....
Seems the heteros are pumping them out in sufficient numbers....go figure!
You musta had a good dance instructor !!!
But I dont see any mention of percentage there.
You stated that heteros are pumping them out in sufficient enough numbers to maintain their species , maintaining ones species is a matter of sheer numbers, NOT PERCENTAGES of anything.
so I mentioned the fact that the SHEER NUMBERS are dwindling in Europe.
YOU BROUGHT IT UP.
Now, lets see if you can be man enough, and show some character, and admit you are wrong. I do recall someone else doing that recently, , lets see if you can do it too.
There's no dancing involved. Whether it's 3 or 4 out of 100 or 3,000,000-4,000,000 out of 100,000,000, the homosexual population is being maintained by the heterosexual couples that have children. Their NUMBERS within the total population appears to remain fairly constant. That NUMBER is typically represented with a PERCENTAGE.
funny how you pulled that out of context.
My statement, that it isnt happening in Europe was in response to statement BEFORE the two you selected.\\
Your tactics are obvious and pathetically weak, just proves you are deserate and wrong.
since their population by natural birth is dwindling, then they ARENT maintaining the homosexual population also.
Then PLEASE provide the data that "Whether it's 3 or 4 out of 100 or 3,000,000-4,000,000 out of 100,000,000, the homosexual population is being maintained by the heterosexual couples that have children." isn't true.
That's not out of context, and the statement CLEARLY states the maintenance of a 3-4 PERCENT population.
Sorry Pale, but it's an undeniable fact that nearly every, if not every, homosexual is born to heterosexual parents. As yet, I've seen no evidence that awareness of the existence of homosexuals has caused anyone to "switch teams". If kids to be "talked" into homosexuality, their numbers would be showing a drastic increase.
Firstly, that's not what I said. However, if I had, you couldn't provide a single shred of reliable evidence to support that statement...it doesn't exist. Homosexuals have always existed, even in cultures where discovery meant a swift death, and certainly before kids were told "Johnny has two daddies" stories in school.