So now it is "flare" when it suits your ideology. Do you believe that innocent people have been found guilty? By a jury? Otherwise, who cares about all these innocent people being let free. Let us refresh your memory:
including six convicts who proved their innocence
Ah, according to your logic, these folks should not have been pardoned by, then Governor, now President Bush, because "the jury would have ruled otherwise."
He has to prove his innocence first. He will get appeals and have that opportunity. Sorry my hearts not breaking for Libby here and if he doesn’t and Bush wishes it’s his right to pardon him. That doesn’t mean I’m gona go around touting the mans innocence right now when it has yet to be proven to me and has in fact as far as we know been proven otherwise.
No one asked you tout it, but it would be nice if you changed your avi to a "support Libby" avi.
It is clear that you have nothing to substantiate your belief that he is guilty. You completely sidestepped the part about those convicted by a JURY and then later found guilty. And have stepped away from your "sources" as they are but stories. That was your sole premise on his guilt. Now it seems you are coming down to, well, a "feeling" that he is guilty.
Honestly, aren't you being biased?
Libby was tried for his crimes and found guilty. Why should he be more worthy of a pardon that the average drug runner or pedophile? Because he is a friend of the Bushies?
I haven't followed the story close enough to form a set in stone opinion on whether or not he is guilty or innocent. I know what I have read and what i think now. Will see how it turn out. This stories pretty boring tho.
But If you'll wear a support any convicted criminal of my choosing, I'll wear a support libby avi. Seeing as you don't think the courts are reliable enough to judge innocence or guilt.