I believe he did rank him number one...and I believe that he came to Boston a quater of a century later to sing the praises of John Kerry.... and I believe that eight years after THAT, he claimed that John Kerry was unfit for command. I believe that those diametrically opposite points of view prove that he was not telling the truth - either then, or now. Either way, he is a proven liar. Do you disagree?
the fact that I agreed with what his POV was over 30 years ago does not mean that I agree with his POV today. And clearly, the word "agree" is present tense. No proven liars agree with my point of view. Elliot, in one instance, AGREED with my POV over a quarter of a century ago.....
so I guess you haven't asnwered shit.
try again or just admit that you don't CARE whether the swifties were liars or not, as long as they denigrated Kerry.
it is only with the disparity between the statements that their integrity is impeached. I have no desire to quote either side of their statements... they are liars and I, for one, place little value in the statements of liars.... but you, apparently do.
why am I not surprised?
Kerry was proven to be a fraud, and we had an election on the issue
Your side lost MFM. Get over it
Last edited by red states rule; 08-18-2008 at 06:22 AM.
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan