just heard it on the radio....legislation sponsored by San Francisco folks.....
just heard it on the radio....legislation sponsored by San Francisco folks.....
"I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is."
~Albert Camus
it would still be illegal at the fed level. Kinda pointless.
"I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is."
~Albert Camus
good, it will also free up more beds in the prisons/jails since weed will not be illegal
Before enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. ~Zen Buddhist Proverb
It's an interesting question. The Constitution states that Federal laws made under the authority granted by the Constitution, supersede any conflicting state or local laws.
And there are certainly Federal laws banning Marijuana, growing it, possessing it, selling it etc.
But are those Federal laws, made under the authority of the US Constitution?
Another section of the Constitution says that the Federal government has ONLY the powers explicitly granted it by the Constitution... and that all others are "reserved to the States, or to the People." Meaning, the Fed does NOT have any power to regulate those others.
If someone grows some maryjane and transports or sells it over a state line, then the Fed can make a colorable argument that they can regulate it, under the Interstate Commerce clause.
But what if the guy grows it and smokes it himself, and/or sells it to his friends, all within the same state so it never crosses a state line or even comes close?
A number of people believe the Fed CANNOT regulate that in-state weed in any way, since it is not at all involved in "commerce among the several states".
Some lawyer in a court case once tried to make the argument that, since certain articles were made in a state and consumed completely within that same state, that had the effect of reducing the transport of the same stuff from out of state, into the state. And so the completely in-state stuff, DID affect interstate commerce, and so the Fed COULD regulate it under the Interstate Commerce Clause.
I believe that argument was laughed out of court, and rejected.
Personally, I believe that any one who uses MJ recreationally, has rocks in his head; and I would never do it. And the states can certainly regulate or ban it if they want.
But I don't see where the Fed has ANY authority to ban or restrict MJ, in any way.
"The social contract exists so that everyone doesn’t have to squat in the dust holding a spear to protect his woman and his meat all day every day. It does not exist so that the government can take your spear, your meat, and your woman because it knows better what to do with them." - Instapundit.com
If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin
Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard
If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin
Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard
LA..just wondering...have you ever used any MJ?
UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION
Above the Best
Why the Hell should I have to press “1” for ENGLISH?
Are there any states that do NOT have any laws on their State books, banning MJ? If a guy in one of those states, get busted for MJ, it would have to be under the Federal law. If he gets convicted, he could appeal it all the way up to the US Supreme Court, and he could use the argument that the Fed has no authority to ban or restrict MJ since the stuff he used never left the state.
I don't see any arguments the prosecution could use against him.
If a STATE has state laws against marijuana use, that's different. States DO have authority to restrict or ban MJ if they want to.
Is there any state that has NO such laws on its books?
If there aren't any states like that, then maybe California will become the first, if these proposed laws get passed. I guess the laws essentially repeal any State laws California does have.
Then if a guy is hauled in for growing his own MJ and smoking it in the state, will the Feds prosecute him under the Federal law, or chicken out and let him go?
Last edited by Little-Acorn; 02-23-2009 at 05:34 PM.
"The social contract exists so that everyone doesn’t have to squat in the dust holding a spear to protect his woman and his meat all day every day. It does not exist so that the government can take your spear, your meat, and your woman because it knows better what to do with them." - Instapundit.com
excellent argument. i think though that the in state effect on interstate commerce was upheld as, taken in the aggregate, it substantially effected interstate commerce. i think it was a corn case or something, and i believe the government used the same argument at SCOTUS regarding marijuana....not positive, but i think i remember reading that.
Before enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. ~Zen Buddhist Proverb
Does anyone really think the Feds take any type of limitation of power seriously?
Liberty is the greatest measure of equality.
Economic Left/Right: 9.38, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Sola Scriptura | Soli Deo Gloria | Solo Christo | Sola Gratia | Sola Fide