The evidence is already plain enough.
1. Speaker Pelosi met with the Syrian President and with the head of Israel and attempted to barter a peace proposal.
2. The Constitution, as I already pointed out, and furthermore, showed you, clearly gives that authority to the Executive Branch and not the Speaker of the House.
I've heard libs going on ad infinitum about how Bush is shredding the Constitution whether it was over NSA wiretaps of foreign agents, treating enemy combatants as defendents in criminal cases or revealing the identity of that desk jockey, Valerie Plame.
Now, a member of your side goes off an does something that is clearly in violation of the US Constitution and what do you do? You defend her. Not only that, but you play word games to boot.
The problem is that you're trying to defend the indefensible. Why don't you just admit that Nancy Pelosi broke the law and should face the consequences?
How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan
Your ideology breaks down right there, Mr. Marx.
All parties have indicated a willingness for peace talks (only the first step to a peace proposal, you understand) for years. Discussing options for such talks is not the same as "bartering a peace proposal." And it sure as sh!t isn't the same as making a treaty.
What kind of "word games?"Now, a member of your side goes off an does something that is clearly in violation of the US Constitution and what do you do? You defend her. Not only that, but you play word games to boot.Because I believe in the whole concept of innocence until proven guilty. No one has yet proved that Speaker Pelosi is actually guilty of anything, and it's unlikely that anyone will.The problem is that you're trying to defend the indefensible. Why don't you just admit that Nancy Pelosi broke the law and should face the consequences?
If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.
How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan
Karl said it well enough:
You however fail.The evidence is already plain enough.
1. Speaker Pelosi met with the Syrian President and with the head of Israel and attempted to barter a peace proposal.
2. The Constitution, as I already pointed out, and furthermore, showed you, clearly gives that authority to the Executive Branch and not the Speaker of the House.
I've heard libs going on ad infinitum about how Bush is shredding the Constitution whether it was over NSA wiretaps of foreign agents, treating enemy combatants as defendents in criminal cases or revealing the identity of that desk jockey, Valerie Plame.
Now, a member of your side goes off an does something that is clearly in violation of the US Constitution and what do you do? You defend her. Not only that, but you play word games to boot.
The problem is that you're trying to defend the indefensible. Why don't you just admit that Nancy Pelosi broke the law and should face the consequences?
You miss the point so blatently it is laughable. She has NO authority.=typomaniac;35124]Your ideology breaks down right there, Mr. Marx.
All parties have indicated a willingness for peace talks (only the first step to a peace proposal, you understand) for years. Discussing options for such talks is not the same as "bartering a peace proposal." And it sure as sh!t isn't the same as making a treaty.
The only games being played are by you. And, you are not very good at it. Congress does not set foreign policy. Do you agree?What kind of "word games?"Because I believe in the whole concept of innocence until proven guilty. No one has yet proved that Speaker Pelosi is actually guilty of anything, and it's unlikely that anyone will.
Yes or no
When have I ever said that she has authority to do anything overseas that a private American citizen can't do?Of course I agree. The Speaker was not setting foreign policy on her trip, nor was she trying to.The only games being played are by you. And, you are not very good at it. Congress does not set foreign policy. Do you agree?
Yes or no
Don't you think Mr. Assad has aides who know perfectly well what the limits of her authority are? (He does, in case you were wondering.)
If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.
You try to answer this with the next sentence, but it fails. She is NOT "private" citizen. But you knew that, right....typomaniac;35153]When have I ever said that she has authority to do anything overseas that a private American citizen can't do?
Don't lie. Her objective was to open up TALKS between syria and the us. She admitted it. Nice try.Of course I agree. The Speaker was not setting foreign policy on her trip, nor was she trying to.
This is beyond comprehension. Are you well?Don't you think Mr. Assad has aides who know perfectly well what the limits of her authority are? (He does, in case you were wondering.)
Talk about missing the point. I said that when she's overseas she can't do anything that a private citizen overseas can't do.Why do you and your rah-rah buddies keep insisting that talking to foreigners is equivalent to setting foreign policy? For the third or fourth time now, it isn't.Don't lie. Her objective was to open up TALKS between syria and the us. She admitted it. Nice try.I would ask "are you able to read English," but I have more class than that.This is beyond comprehension. Are you well?
If you're worth less than $5 million and you vote for McCain, you're a loser.
After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown
“Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
-Abbey
Hasn't everyone, without exception, committed a felony in the USA? Ignorance or not being caught is no defence.
“Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face” - Thomas Sowell
“What "multiculturalism" boils down to is that you can praise any culture in the world except Western culture - and you cannot blame any culture in the world except Western culture” - Thomas Sowell
How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan
Thanks Mr Marx.I bet he feels like a fool now, or at least he should.