Originally Posted by
manfrommaine
but yet, this is how the topic was broached:
I said:
"are you suggesting that the only reason we would have a carrier group in the northern arabian sea was to keep tabs on Saddam? HAHAHAHAHA
that's hilarious!
to which you replied:
"Is it? Every time we entered the Gulf, we went straight to Kuwait. We sat on the Kuwait-Iraq border while the ARG provided air support for Operation Southern Watch."
All I am saying is that I am sure you know what amphibious ready groups do more than me.... just as I am sure that I know what carrier battle groups do more than you. And I certainly have a better developed sense of what the costs are for such an operation as a percentage of the defense department budget. Now...do you really want to dispute that?
The ARG is part of a carrier battle group.
And for all of your bluster and dragging things out, you have not PROVEN you have a better developed sense of what the costs are such an operation as a percentage of the DoD budget.
I await you posting a link to support your argument.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke