Page 21 of 47 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 315 of 699
  1. #301
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Biggest Little City In The World
    Posts
    1,569
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Study shows link between homosexuality and pedophilia




    By Interim Staff

    A new study by Dr. Timothy J. Dailey and the Washington D.C.-based Family Research Council recently confirmed what police and psychiatrists have known for decades: a definitive link exists between male homosexuality and pedophilia.

    The report entitled Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse, shows that while homosexual men make up less than three per cent of the adult male population, they commit a disproportionate number (one third or more) of child sexual molestations. Dailey's report is being sent to parents, youth groups, school administrators, Catholic bishops, and religious organizations.

    Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse presents a number of controversial findings. The first is that a significant percentage of child sexual abuse victims are boys. The second finding of Dailey's report contradicts the "inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey" that homosexuals comprise at least 10 per cent of the population. Based upon a study of three large data sets, the General Social Survey, the National Health and Social Life Survey, and the U.S. Census, "a recent study in demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 per cent, and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 per cent," writes Dailey.

    The FRC study also demonstrates, with a wealth of anecdotal evidence, that pedophile themes can be found throughout "mainstream" gay literature, including fiction anthologies such as: The Penguin Book on International Gay Writing, The Gay Canon: What Every Gay Man Should Read, and A History of Gay Literature:The Male Tradition. Interestingly, the late gay Beat poet Allen Ginsberg was a pedophile, and wrote articles for publications associated with the North American Man-Boy Love Association. "I reread Collected Poems and Ginsberg's two subsequent collections, surprised by the pattern of reference to anal intercourse and to pederasty that emerged," writes Dailey.

    According to Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse, pedophiles have long existed as a subculture within the gay rights movement. Dailey quotes David Thorstad, a homosexual activist and founding member of NAMBLA, to demonstrate that by 1985, pedophilia had gained acceptance within the homosexual movement, as it was in that year that NAMBLA was admitted as a member in New York's council of Lesbian and Gay Organizations and the International Gay Association. In the words of Jim Kepner, at one time the curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles: "A point I've been trying to make is that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today, we'd better stop waving the banner of the ancient Greeks, of Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part of our history unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be gay."

    The link between homosexuality and pedophilia is rejected by many mainstream research groups, which have even begun to view pedophilia in value-neutral terms. The American Psychiatric Association removed pedophilia from its list of sexual perversions in 1994, while in 1999 the American Psychological Association published a report, "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," which "claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless and beneficial," according to a 1999 WorldNetDaily column by noted researcher Dr. Judith Reisman.

    "None of this is news in the sense that this information (the link between pedophilia and homosexuality) was fundamentally proven a long time ago," Canada Family Action head Brian Rushfeldt told The Interim, "but I'm glad to see the FRC reiterating it, especially at a time when the Catholic church is struggling with the pedophile priest issue."

    Rushfeldt stresses that pedophiles come in both homosexual and heterosexual forms, but there are differences between the two that need to be understood. "Do you treat the cocaine addict the same way you treat the alcoholic? If a priest abuses young boys, that's a homosexual act, and we have to recognize it as such if we want to help him."

    Asked why the link exists in the first place, Rushfeldt, a former addiction counsellor, says part of the answer lies in the availability of sex. "Sex addicts generally need instant gratification. They have a very low threshold for delaying gratification, and it's much easier to manipulate a young boy into having sex than it is to manipulate another man." He adds that homosexual pedophilia is influenced by other factors as well.

    "There's a distinct quality about male homosexuality that gay men tend to be attracted to young, good-looking guys. Another part of pedophilia's appeal is the power the pedophile feels in manipulating the boy. It's a combination of things."

    http://www.theinterim.com/2002/sept/02study.html

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Biggest Little City In The World
    Posts
    1,569
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheStripey1 View Post
    you certainly haven't forgotten about mark foley have you?

    oh... I bet you did...
    Homosexuality and Pedophilia


    By Cliff Kincaid | November 2, 2006


    In connection with media coverage of the Mark Foley sex scandal, the pro-homosexual media enforcers have been attempting to refute the idea that there is any connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. Yet Foley targeted young boys. This is something you are not supposed to write or talk about because it undermines the cause of homosexual rights.

    Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth says, "…isn't it telling most of the tiny number of homosexual male U.S. Congressmen have been caught in sex scandals-remember Barney Frank, who let his male lover, a hustler, run a prostitution ring out of his D.C. apartment? And Massachusetts Rep. Gerry Studds, who had sex with a 17-year-old boy and then turned his back on fellow House Members during the censure vote against him? And Bob Bauman, who in 1980 was charged with soliciting a 16-year-old boy for sex?"

    Adding it up, LaBarbera says, "Let's see: three homosexual Congressmen involved in sexual seductions of minor boys-ages 16, 17, and 17 (Foley). And yet homosexual activists ridicule anyone who suggests there is a predatory or pedophilic component to male homosexuality…"

    On October 2, when the supposed right-wing Fox News Channel aired a "debate" on the matter of the Foley scandal, the two sides were represented by liberal Democrat Bob Beckel, who got caught in a prostitution scandal, and lesbian Republican Tammy Bruce.

    "Being homosexual has nothing to do with attraction to children," declared Bruce. "I agree. I agree," Beckel said.

    But then she seemed to contradict herself, saying, "All I want frankly is a gay person in office who is not a sexual compulsive. I mean is that too much to ask for? I don't think it is."

    Bruce has appeared at functions sponsored by the Log Cabin Republicans, the homosexual activist group whose executive director had defended Foley's refusal over the years to respond to questions about his homosexuality. Still, she recognized the "compulsive" nature of what has been happening on Capitol Hill.

    On the O'Reilly Factor on October 9, homosexual activist Mike Rogers, a prominent advocate of "outing" secret gays, tried to deny the existence of any link between homosexuality and pedophilia. O'Reilly sounded dubious of that claim, at least in terms of what he said would be a public perception of the implications of the Foley case, but failed to cite any evidence to the contrary. However, Steven Baldwin wrote a scholarly piece for the Regent Law School review summarizing the evidence-mostly from the homosexual community-suggesting a strong link. Baldwin also tells me: "Proportionately, homosexual pedophiles are a far greater threat to society than are heterosexual pedophiles."

    Yet the Washington Post, in an October 7 editorial, "Anti-Gay Ugliness," claimed that the "research on this topic, though small-scale and not recent, does not show that gay men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children." Significantly, it did not discuss or cite any research.

    As bad as the Foley scandal is shaping up, it then turned out, according to the Washington Post itself, that homosexual Republican Rep. Jim Kolbe was close to several pages, and even opened his home to them (supposedly when he was away). This was reported in the process of disclosing that Kolbe knew of Foley's overtures to the pages six years ago. Kolbe's involvement with the pages was portrayed by the paper as entirely innocent, something that seems ridiculous on its face, considering the evidence already on the table.

    The burden, it would seem, is on Kolbe to prove his hands are clean.

    http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A4989_0_2_0_C/

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Biggest Little City In The World
    Posts
    1,569
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Homosexual pedophiles know no bounds. They can be anyone, republican, democrat, priest, doesn't matter. They're all sick and need to be exposed.

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pale Rider View Post
    Homosexual pedophiles know no bounds. They can be anyone, republican, democrat, priest, doesn't matter. They're all sick and need to be exposed.
    You know you could remove the word "Homosexual" from that sentence and it would still be equally valid, don't you think?
    Pork, good for you, bad for Muslims and Jews.

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuc View Post
    You know you could remove the word "Homosexual" from that sentence and it would still be equally valid, don't you think?
    Of course not! Everyone knows if it weren't for homosexuals, there wouldn't be any pedophilia or sexually transmitted diseases.

    Easy question PR...if there's a link between homosexuality and pedophilia, why are the majority (at least 60-75%...probably more) of pedophiles heterosexual? Wouldn't that mean there's a link between heterosexuality and pedophilia too?

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Biggest Little City In The World
    Posts
    1,569
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    Of course not! Everyone knows if it weren't for homosexuals, there wouldn't be any pedophilia or sexually transmitted diseases.

    Easy question PR...if there's a link between homosexuality and pedophilia, why are the majority (at least 60-75%...probably more) of pedophiles heterosexual? Wouldn't that mean there's a link between heterosexuality and pedophilia too?
    You're trying to manipulate numbers. It's been tried before, (by you), and debunked. To put it simple, there's far more heterosexual pedophiles than homosexual, but the occurance of child molestation, specifically man to boy, is far more prevalent, per incident, among homosexual pedophiles than hetero.

    It still puzzles me to no end why you people will spin, twist, lie and distort, in an attempt to protect, support, or somehow otherwise enable such a vile and perverted sickness. You people are part of the problem.
    Last edited by Pale Rider; 04-23-2007 at 11:15 AM.

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306082

    Default

    Actually, it is the obsessed homophobes that are much of the problem. They take their sick, religious-based beliefs and attempt to force them on the majority of society that allows all people to live their own lives.
    Homophobia is the deviant sickness, not homosexuality.

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    san antonio
    Posts
    3,310
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Actually, it is the obsessed homophobes that are much of the problem. They take their sick, religious-based beliefs and attempt to force them on the majority of society that allows all people to live their own lives.
    Homophobia is the deviant sickness, not homosexuality.
    Great logic. Suppose that means those of us concerned about pedophiles are more of a problem than pedophiles themselves.
    PRAIRIE FIRE by William Ayers: Obama's guide to destory America
    "Maybe I missed that part of the Constitution"--Joe Steel
    You can't spell Liberals without Lies.

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Actually, it is the obsessed homophobes that are much of the problem. They take their sick, religious-based beliefs and attempt to force them on the majority of society that allows all people to live their own lives.
    Homophobia is the deviant sickness, not homosexuality.
    whhhoooey! gotta love libs!

  10. #310
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Biggest Little City In The World
    Posts
    1,569
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    whhhoooey! gotta love libs!
    No shit aye. The garbage that little twirp spews is so twisted, well, let's just say I hope SHE doesn't own a gun, because she's certifiably nuts!

  11. #311
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    725
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    232

    Default

    Study shows link between homosexuality and pedophilia




    By Interim Staff

    A new study by Dr. Timothy J. Dailey and the Washington D.C.-based Family Research Council recently confirmed what police and psychiatrists have known for decades: a definitive link exists between male homosexuality and pedophilia.
    Family Research Council. LOL. You couldn't find a more impartial source than that. *snicker*

    So, what peer-reviewed journal accepted this paper for publication? *snicker*

  12. #312
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pale Rider View Post
    No shit aye. The garbage that little twirp spews is so twisted, well, let's just say I hope SHE doesn't own a gun, because she's certifiably nuts!

    Not stupid, just misguided is my guess. Comes from spending way too much time in Berkeley, CA......its a wasteland of lost potential.

  13. #313
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdzeye View Post
    Family Research Council. LOL. You couldn't find a more impartial source than that. *snicker*

    So, what peer-reviewed journal accepted this paper for publication? *snicker*

    Attacking the source, clever, how about refuting the findings of this "biased" source.

    *wink* *wink*.....i've asked this question of libs before and none will answer.

  14. #314
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200647

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdzeye View Post
    Family Research Council. LOL. You couldn't find a more impartial source than that. *snicker*

    So, what peer-reviewed journal accepted this paper for publication? *snicker*

    Shoot the messenger when you can't dispute the evidence.

  15. #315
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    725
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    232

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Attacking the source, clever, how about refuting the findings of this "biased" source.

    *wink* *wink*.....i've asked this question of libs before and none will answer.
    Family Research Council has a track record for political (i.e., right wing) bias. Just as you wouldn't accept DU as a reliable source, neither should you expect me to accept FRC as one either.

    Now, if you tell me that some peer-reviewed scientific journal has accepted this piece for publication, that would be a different matter. If you can't, or won't, then you have diddly squat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums