"Religious Tolerance" in EGYPT

[Noir]

Bodies and or major injuries from the police isn't enough?

wow, well, maybe its just having grown up in Northern Ireland, but a few bloody faces and an acidental death is hardly anything to write home about.

Riot police to quell the situation, yes. Riot police to engage and kill people, no.

Right, riot police that must quell a violent mob without engaging, got ya =/

The NYC riot police and probably the FBI would be sent on to the scene and ALL violent people will likely be brought down with tasers, bean bags and other non-lethal means and they will all be arrested. I certainly wouldn't expect them to start killing people who are throwing rocks!!

BTW - you have me confused with another "Christian". Seems many times you try and toss christianity in my face when I speak the truth about muslims. Thing is - I AM NOT RELIGIOUS and don't defend the actions of "christians".

Oh, but what if one of those tasers kills someone? Or what if a non-leathal like a batton round hits someones face and they get a bloody nose and someone is their to film it!!!!

When you take part in a violent riot you take a chance, and chance that you have put yourself in. Now clearly if the police wanted to they could of shot hundres of these people dead, afterall they arrested 400ish of them, the fact that only one died and a few others got a broken face should be a relief.

[jimnyc]

wow, well, maybe its just having grown up in Northern Ireland, but a few bloody faces and an acidental death is hardly anything to write home about.

Well, in most civilized societies we still take ANY deaths at a protest very seriously.

Right, riot police that must quell a violent mob without engaging, got ya =/

I never said they couldn't engage. In fact, I clearly laid out what they should do when they engage. You make no sense.

Oh, but what if one of those tasers kills someone? Or what if a non-leathal like a batton round hits someones face and they get a bloody nose and someone is their to film it!!!!

Wait, you just stated a second ago that I stated they shouldn't engage. Now your replying to the portion I wrote about them engaging. Weird, isn't it?

And your analogies are retarded. I'm talking about riot police throwing rocks and shooting at protesters. Again, at least in the civilized society I live in, the riot police do not throw rocks at protesters and they don't shoot them. They engage in non lethal means to the best of their ability.

When you take part in a violent riot you take a chance, and chance that you have put yourself in. Now clearly if the police wanted to they could of shot hundres of these people dead, afterall they arrested 400ish of them, the fact that only one died and a few others got a broken face should be a relief.

Maybe police should be doing their jobs and not engaging protesters in a rock throwing duel?

[Noir]

Well, in most civilized societies we still take ANY deaths at a protest very seriously.

Ofcourse it should be taken seriously, but it should be in no way surprising, and if anything expected. But do you not agree that if theh police where out on a mission to kill that there would be allot more dead than one?

I never said they couldn't engage. In fact, I clearly laid out what they should do when they engage. You make no sense.

Oh right, see when you said "Riot police to engage and kill people, no." I thought would meant they shouldn't engage =/ and obviously the death was either an accident or the action of an individual, and not part of a policy to kill the rioters.

Wait, you just stated a second ago that I stated they shouldn't engage. Now your replying to the portion I wrote about them engaging. Weird, isn't it?

Yeah, because i was being sarcastic. Re-read with the sarcasm intended please

And your analogies are retarded. I'm talking about riot police throwing rocks and shooting at protesters. Again, at least in the civilized society I live in, the riot police do not throw rocks at protesters and they don't shoot them. They engage in non lethal means to the best of their ability.

No method is non-leathal, just less-likey-to-be-lethal.
Obiously i don't think the police should of used rocks etc, seems rather unprofesional,

...but yeah, we're civilised enough to fire plastic batons and shot electric jolts (please note sarcasm here)

Maybe police should be doing their jobs and not engaging protesters in a rock throwing duel?

Oh yeah, their job of qwelling a violent protest without engaging xD
As i said, rock throwing is silly, but iroicly it was probably the most non-lethal weapon used that day xD