Originally Posted by
PostmodernProphet
but it was NOT what you claimed it was when you posted this..
in truth, they weren't even close to that......it's like taking a lego car and changing it slightly by moving a few blocks, then claiming you invented the automobile.....
I want to get more into this thread later, but for right now I want to add this.
I think its funny that pro evolutionists think if they can create life from non living matter in a lab, that will somehow help, or actually prove that life evolved on its own.
The absurdity of that concept. First, it will show that it took an intelligent being to create the life. Second, it will show that even with an intelligent being involved, it was incredibily difficult, so wouldnt that actually kinda be proving that it couldnt really have happened on accident?
The only way to prove that evolution could have happened, and that wouldnt even be proof that it "did" happen, would be to take the elements neccessary and watch them gather themselves together somehow , someway, without any input whatsoever by an outsider, except as an observer.
Last thing is, I would love to see an "evolutionist" put together a time line, a choronological scenario that accounts for each and every major life form and how it came about to exist. A "flow chart" if you will, on evolution. OK, here we have the single cell, then the multi cellular,
then we have this little species here, that became this species, that became that species which eventually became a giraffe. Then they would have to have a "flow chart" or family tree that would account for every major species that exists today. I dont think they could do it, and much less do it to include ALL the species that exist.
The sheer number of changes that would have had to have occured over the given time we have, would be too numerous for the amount of time alloted, because each and every transistional phase would have to be accounted for, I mean, how many "mutations" would have had to occur over time to account for a single cell evolving into a horse, lets say. Then you have to do that for every species, and I simply think you would quickly run out of time ,,,,especially considering a vast number of mutations are actually negative ones that dont cause an improvement in the species and thus fades away.
I DONT CLAIM TO KN0OW ANYTHING ABOUT HUMAN NATURE
NOIR DO I KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT CRITICAL THINKING