Originally Posted by
ConHog
Oops I forgot about the Mexican-American War actually being a declared war.
I understand the thought that the POTUS should not have the power to unilaterally send our military into action; but the COTUS in fact does make him the commander in chief, and does not limit military engagements to declared wars only.
I would concur however that perhaps the Congress should vote on war or not when the POTUS feels military action is justified, but what if just as a political statement they vote no ? Then you have a POTUS who is either cut off at the knees OR you see a POTUS engaging in military action with a public "we do not agree" from Congress.
I just think it's better the way it is.
ConHog, you should read "Bomb Power," a book I listed in my Non-Fiction thread. It's entertaining on this issue.
The specific set of foolish ideas that has laid claim to the name 'supply side economics' is a crank doctrine that would have little influence if it did not appeal to the prejudices of editors and wealthy men" -- Paul Krugman
You will respect my atoritay!- ConHog aka Cartman