Originally Posted by
OCA
True that Gunster, there is currently NO constitutional provisions being denied citizens who CHOOSE to engage in the homosexual lifestyle. Should we broaden the constitution to cover lifestyle choices?
If we want to open Pandora's Box. Besides, since when did Obama need the Constitution to do anything? He can just declare it like he has everything else. I think he's trying to surpass even Abraham Lincoln in Constitutional violations.
The fact is, NO ONE has a Constutional right to marriage. As far as all the whining goes, being denied benefits by corporations/insurance companies and or other self-serving corporations is a separate issue. The left and homo-supporters just want to make everyone believe the term "marriage" will cover everything.
Too, the left cries about any and every mention of religion in government (which is not unconstitutional to begin with); yet, they want to force their secular bullshit on Christianity.
Want to let gays have civil unions? Go for it. Legally, that's ALL heterosexuals have. The law allows the church to perform the ceremonies because it's convenient for them. You STILL have to go down and pay for that state license before Father May I can marry you. If the JP had to do them all, he might miss that chicken fried steak dinner and tee-time.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke