Your head exploded
Sassy responded with an ALTERNATE spelling , yes, but she didn't point to some stupid urban dictionary entry as some sort of proof of anything now did she? No because Sassy wouldn't stir shit, radio on the other hand..............Originally Posted by Jess
Semper Fidelis
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." -Mark Twain
Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours.
Senior Member
Did I say sassylady was a doo doo stirrer?
Semper Fidelis
Heck, I would have called him a dork and moved on. But I don't take all of this too seriously.
Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours.
Your head exploded
That doesn't even make sense Jess. It's a FACT that Shattered/Dis has engaged ME first in more flaming on this board than the reverse is true. It's not even debatable. Look in THIS very thread, she had no reason to engage me but oh she did. Now go find a thread somewhere where she was posting to another person and I just popped in to flame her for no reason."There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." -Mark Twain
Semper Fidelis
Nope, Shadow, you absolutely did not.
Just pointing out that she responded with the correct spelling first, I believe. So why is it that Radio gets the credit for stirring the pot? I gave the correct spelling as well. Wasn't trying to stir the pot either. But I've never seen it spelled any other way, meaning what CH was meaning.
Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours.
Huge Douchebag
Pointing out an accepted definition that defines a spelling is shit stirring?Another example of shit stirring...
Your head exploded
Pardon, but I DID just call him a shit stirrer and move on. And oh yes you take this far more seriously than you claim you do. Always cracks me up to see you pretend otherwise.
Huge Douchebag
It appears that no matter what I post it will be considered shit stirring.
I can live with that.
Your head exploded
urban dictionary =/= accepted definition since ANYONE can make an entry and it in fact doesn't have any standards.Pointing out an accepted definition that defines a spelling is shit stirring?
But you of course knew that.
Semper Fidelis
Didn't you "out" her on this board, calling her by her name from a different board?
Now, given that this is the most posting I've ever done in the Steel Cage that wasn't goofing around (and there IS a reason for that, btw), I can't sit here and give you numbers. And I refuse to waste my time even looking it up. It's not worth it.
How about this? The two of you engage each other equally? I don't really care. Name-calling with intent to hurt isn't cool no matter who it comes from. WTH? Are we not out of grade school? And yes, CH - that statement is for EVERYBODY, not just you. That's my personal feeling.
Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours.
Senior Member
Please stop playing dumb. If you want to defend your little friend fine. But don't act like he is all innocent when we both know that is not true. the following definition which he posted:
1. dike - an idiot who can't spell dyke.
1987 up, 441 down
Is not someone "just being helpful" with spelling.
Huge Douchebag
I disagree.
It is sorted on the site by the number of users approving of the entry. By it's very nature, this means it is the 'accepted' definition.
Semper Fidelis
You have a beef with Radio. Fine.Please stop playing dumb. If you want to defend your little friend fine. But don't act like he is all innocent when we both know that is not true. the following definition which he posted:
1. dike - an idiot who can't spell dyke.
1987 up, 441 down
Is not someone "just being helpful" with spelling.
I don't. That should be fine too.
The urban dictionary is used all the time to give definitions. Anybody CAN post their meanings. As so they can on wikipedia.
Come on, people. This is ridiculous.
Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours.
Your head exploded
I believe I actually did out her, under the impression that everyone knew who she was. So that is ONE time I've started shit with her.
You admit you don't know, so why then just make a statement that she generally only responds? She in fact does not. I had her on ignore for a few weeks, maybe a month, and decided to take her off because it didn't slow down her insults. I don't have a problem with you not knowing, I do have a problem with you commenting on that you don't know about.
And by problem I mean within this thread, not in the general sense of things.
As for your final comment Jess. You are either missing or ignoring my point. That dumb bitch comes into a thread and just mouths off starts a fight and nothing is said unless and until I or another "unapproved" person responds. Then here two or three people will come running in with "oh my can't we alll just get along?"
At the VERY least that gives the impression that some are allowed to flame while others need not apply. Now whether that is what you intend or not is irrelevant, it's all about what others see.
Posting Permissions
