Who's smarter: Jesus or Buddha?

[ConHog]

Damn Dorothy should change her religion so that she can start worshiping the Dali Drama.

[Wind Song]

I get the message. You are a lesbian and hate everything man. If a man posts, he gets scorn, because you hate all men. You got it.

You more or less told me that this thread is not about Buddhism and that my posts related to the Buddha aren't welcome. I get it. I'm not mad at you. I accept how things are here.

[Wind Song]

Damn Dorothy should change her religion so that she can start worshiping the Dali Drama.

Cute joke.

[ConHog]

You more or less told me that this thread is not about Buddhism and that my posts related to the Buddha aren't welcome. I get it. I'm not mad at you. I accept how things are here.

If you're posts don't get deleted, that means they are wanted. People disagreeing with you is not the same thing as people saying you or your opinions are not wanted. Do you not see the difference?

[Wind Song]

If you're posts don't get deleted, that means they are wanted. People disagreeing with you is not the same thing as people saying you or your opinions are not wanted. Do you not see the difference?

Jim said this:

"this isn't a thread meant to discuss Buddha."

[logroller]

Jim said this:

"this isn't a thread meant to discuss Buddha."

I'd disagree with that statement. The thread OP clearly requires it.

Stand your ground Dorothy.

[jimnyc]

You more or less told me that this thread is not about Buddhism and that my posts related to the Buddha aren't welcome. I get it. I'm not mad at you. I accept how things are here.

Too bad things here aren't as you describe. You make shit up and the ENTIRE board sees it. I'm unsure why you continue to always say things that people never said, but you are literally starting to look a little mental by continuing this behavior. You wonder why you can't get along with people here - it's simply because you make it that way, you invent things and then believe your own words. That's scary.

[Wind Song]

You said, "this is not a thread to discuss Buddha". Those are your words.

[jimnyc]

I'd disagree with that statement. The thread OP clearly requires it.

Stand your ground Dorothy.

Not really! The title is a question, and the only qualifier in the OP was "...Just based on who managed to not get themselves crucified".

You're just egging on the patients!

[jimnyc]

You said, "this is not a thread to discuss Buddha". Those are your words.

Point being, it was YOU who originally read my response and stated "end of discussion". I cleared up any misconceptions and explained why I simply answered the question. I know that's an awful lot to take in, but you'll survive my violent words.

[Wind Song]

Not really! The title is a question, and the only qualifier in the OP was "...Just based on who managed to not get themselves crucified".

You're just egging on the patients!

You said: this isn't a thread to discuss Buddha.

I guess Jesus wins by default because Buddha can't be discussed on the thread.

[Wind Song]

Point being, it was YOU who originally read my response and stated "end of discussion". I cleared up any misconceptions and explained why I simply answered the question. I know that's an awful lot to take in, but you'll survive my violent words.

What am I missing?

You said: "This isn't a thread to discuss Buddha"

[jimnyc]

You more or less told me that this thread is not about Buddhism and that my posts related to the Buddha aren't welcome. I get it. I'm not mad at you. I accept how things are here.

What am I missing?

You said: "This isn't a thread to discuss Buddha"

Because you can't make it about one thread - you have to make it about the entire board, as if you are a victim and there is something wrong with "here".

[Wind Song]

Because you can't make it about one thread - you have to make it about the entire board, as if you are a victim and there is something wrong with "here".

Apparently, Jesus can be discussed on a thread about who is smarter, Jesus or Buddha, but this isn't a thread to discuss Buddha. Those are your words.

[jimnyc]

Apparently, Jesus can be discussed on a thread about who is smarter, Jesus or Buddha, but this isn't a thread to discuss Buddha. Those are your words.

It was MY point of view, that this was meant as a humorous thread, I believe even said so by the thread starter. Or at least meant as light hearted I believe. I never said you could discuss one and not the other. My point was that it didn't seem like the thread was intended to discuss the history of either or. And when I said "this isn't a thread to discuss Buddha", that simply means that I don't think the thread was intended for such. That's not me telling you what you can and cannot post. If anyone did such, it would be you, who told me the discussion was over because you didn't like my reply. Stop being a victim and just continue posting whatever you like.