The First Amendment

[ConHog]

For crying out loud, why do you imagine I chose the site I did? It gave analysis that was identical to what you just try to claim as a thought. Did you read it? If not, cool, but then don't quote my post and link. Thank you.

was that even remotely necessary? I was essentially agreeing with you.

[Kathianne]

was that even remotely necessary? I was essentially agreeing with you.

It's one of the reasons I have so little tolerance for your postings at times. You act like you want discussion, then you attempt to co-opt others contributions. Soon followed by, 'I see your point, but sometimes/people/issues are not quite what you say, imo this is wrong, here is how I am right...'

If you'd just say your point of view or even specify what you think may be wrong in someone else's post, but not co-opt, it wouldn't be so very annoying.

[Kathianne]

CH, I'm sorry for getting upset in public, but you've often asked me why I get so peeved with you. Now you know. I've tried to ignore it, but perhaps it's just better to acknowledge it. Now you do what you want, I'll just go, "here we go again..." and try to move on from there.

This forum is a very good idea, I'm glad you suggested it.

[ConHog]

It's one of the reasons I have so little tolerance for your postings at times. You act like you want discussion, then you attempt to co-opt others contributions. Soon followed by, 'I see your point, but sometimes/people/issues are not quite what you say, imo this is wrong, here is how I am right...'

If you'd just say your point of view or even specify what you think may be wrong in someone else's post, but not co-opt, it wouldn't be so very annoying.

I don't give a shit if you like me or not, has nothing to do with the first amendment. Take your belly aching to the steel cage. We can play down there if you like.

[Kathianne]

I don't give a shit if you like me or not, has nothing to do with the first amendment. Take your belly aching to the steel cage. We can play down there if you like.

I'm off to work, perhaps you can read the last post before this? Swearing doesn't bother me, btw.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I don't give a shit if you like me or not, has nothing to do with the first amendment. Take your belly aching to the steel cage. We can play down there if you like.

What? You guys have a steel cage here!-

[ConHog]

What? You guys have a steel cage here!-

http://www.debatepolicy.com/forumdis...?26-Steel-Cage

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/forumdis...?26-Steel-Cage

Thanks for the info..
That's really ... coooooool
A steel cage match but with no bloodshed..

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

As great as Jefferson was he was not the only Founder nor the only contributor to the birth of our Constitution.
Jefforson had a truly great mind but so did the others . Even Hamilton that wrongly wanted a powerful Central Bank early on. The trick was how do you insure religious freedom without regulating it?
Whats wrong now is people have forgotten that and cry regulating it is the correct path when its far more accurate for the government to do just the opposite. Currently those so radically opposed to Christianity are the ones so strongly in favor of anti-American and anti-Christian religions. They scream freedom (from ) when talking about Christianity and freedom (of) when talking about Islam or any other anti-christian religion!
With that they try to have it both ways which really means they promote the destruction of Christianity while promoting the advancement of its replacement = Islam.. As Islam more readily fits the socialist mindset.
The hypocrisy is that they use the same Constitution (same amensment)to advance the destruction of one religion and the advancement of another.- --Tyr

my guess is that Jefferson would call them all jacknapes..