Uh Oh

[ConHog]

Apparently you will... whoever "them" is.

I think "them" is all OCA's little gay boyfriends he's going to have gay sex with after rampaging that gay marriage is BAD BAD BAD on the internets.

I've actually heard of the phenomenon before married men who fuck guys on the side and then say that isn't gay.

[OCA]

okay , i gotta ask, do u REALLY think that gay people are going to stop having sex if you don't let them marry?

I don't give a fuck if they stop or not...........but no "special rights" granted to them.

No wills of the people overturned when there is no basis in the COTUS for the overturn.

[OCA]

I think "them" is all OCA's little gay boyfriends he's going to have gay sex with after rampaging that gay marriage is BAD BAD BAD on the internets.

I've actually heard of the phenomenon before married men who fuck guys on the side and then say that isn't gay.

yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[DragonStryk72]

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!! You didn't even know what amendment we were talking about.

I know, I know, your argument is moral relativity..............here do this..........google the percentage of population that queer lifestyle choicers are then google new AIDS cases for that group through the CDC and tell me what you come up with.

Then google how AIDS made its way into the national blood supply back in the early days.......let me know what you find out.

I've refuted everything, you simply do not want to acknowledge it.

So, see if I have this rationale of your straight: The Native Americans should commit genocide against the European descendants who brought so much plague and death to their door?

Well, this is pretty much the most civil it's going to get from here on in, so looking over the posts, I'm calling the win for Nell, who at no point required arguments like the above to try, and fail, to gain an advantage. Anyone second this judgment?

[Nell's Room]

I don't give a fuck if they stop or not...........but no "special rights" granted to them.

No wills of the people overturned when there is no basis in the COTUS for the overturn.

Equal rights are not special rights.

[OCA]

So, see if I have this rationale of your straight: The Native Americans should commit genocide against the European descendants who brought so much plague and death to their door?

Well, this is pretty much the most civil it's going to get from here on in, so looking over the posts, I'm calling the win for Nell, who at no point required arguments like the above to try, and fail, to gain an advantage. Anyone second this judgment?

Considering your background with your father you won't mind if I consider your judgement tainted, right?

[gabosaurus]

Can someone show me where individuals who choose the homosexual lifestyle are at birth denied any rights guaranteed by the 14th amendment?

Can you show me where individuals who choose to have cancer or some other bodily or mental defect are denied any rights? Obviously it is not genetics.

[ConHog]

I don't give a fuck if they stop or not...........but no "special rights" granted to them.

No wills of the people overturned when there is no basis in the COTUS for the overturn.

letting them marry who they want isn't a special right you fool

and if you dont' give a fuck, then why even bring AIDS into the discussion except as a further deflection.


Oh, and here's a hint you moron. The Constitution's main purpose is to prevent the many from taking liberty from the few, and no matter how many times you deny it religious liberty is guaranteed to all, even them icky gays.

[OCA]

Equal rights are not special rights.

I know you are an Aussie and all but they are not being denied any rights that haven't already posesssed from birth.

[OCA]

Can you show me where individuals who choose to have cancer or some other bodily or mental defect are denied any rights? Obviously it is not genetics.

Again......those genetic links have been found to a certain extent.

[DragonStryk72]

Considering your background with your father you won't mind if I consider your judgement tainted, right?

lol, Oh, I know you're not man enough to accept judgment. You notice I never asked if you thought it was fair? No, you'll just use another lame excuse to call it a win, cause you don't have the balls admit someone is a better debater, a better anything really, than you are. You tiny, fragile ego would shatter.

[ConHog]

Again......those genetic links have been found to a certain extent.

IRRELEVANT

Unless you can show me where in the COTUS anyone has the right to deny constitutional protections for anyone who chooses to do something yucky.......

[DragonStryk72]

Again......those genetic links have been found to a certain extent.

OH? So now it's "a certain extent" is it? Uh oh, Gabs, better run, you're start to puncture holes in the argument. You know what this means.

[ConHog]

lol, Oh, I know you're not man enough to accept judgment. You notice I never asked if you thought it was fair? No, you'll just use another lame excuse to call it a win, cause you don't have the balls admit someone is a better debater, a better anything really, than you are. You tiny, fragile ego would shatter.

You know he's sitting at home right now stamping his little feet and screaming at his wife that he is a God and we all should bow down to him. If I were her I'd probably go visit my mother right now before the sumbitch starts taking out his frustration on her.

[OCA]

letting them marry who they want isn't a special right you fool

and if you dont' give a fuck, then why even bring AIDS into the discussion except as a further deflection.


Oh, and here's a hint you moron. The Constitution's main purpose is to prevent the many from taking liberty from the few, and no matter how many times you deny it religious liberty is guaranteed to all, even them icky gays.

Nope............COTUS doesn't cover queer marriage in anyway, shape or form. It doesn't even address majority vs minority unless you are implying now that the federalist papers are part of COTUS.

Again, remember what i've said about society and limits Gomer.