Julian Assange (WikiLeaks) granted asylum

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Cheerleading or a defeatist attitude ? They are polar opposites. You're gonna have to start making some sense here. Never said GB hasn't had socialism longer than we have. Just pointing out that since FDR we have had our share and really don't need to be warned of the dangers.

Yes they are opposites and that was why I used them. In that your posts declared that it was hopeless to defend against Islam (defeatest attitude) and seem more like (cheerleading) their power , greatness and invincibility!
Had you truly researched about Britian's muslim scourge you would have sen the leftist alliance there with muslims. Leftists/dems defend and promote muslims here too.

here is a link..

http://www.redstate.com/breeanneh/20...joins-the-dnc/

Democratic National Convention will open with a focus on Islam. ?20,000 Muslims are expected to attend according to the?Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs (BIMA), the national Muslim American non-profit coordinating the two days of events they?claim?are non-political. ?”Jumah at the DNC” begins August 29 and will start with a Friday afternoon jummah prayer followed by other unnamed programs and events, leading up to the Islamic Regal Banquet. The following day will be an all day Islamic Cultural and Fun Fest which will include discussions on the topics of?Islamaphobia, Anti-Shariah, Middle Eastern Crisis, Patriot Act, National Defense Authorization Act and more. ?The purpose, according to BIMA, is to attract national and international attention to the plight of American Muslims and to hold political parties accountable for issues that affect them. ?However, not all Muslims feel that BIMA represents them and M. Zuhdi Jasser M.D., Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, has expressed serious concerns.

It is troubling that the Democratic National Convention has decided to promote and lend its name and national political platform to the organizers of the ?Jummah at the DNC?. The leaders of this event ? Jibril Hough and Imam Siraj Wahhaj as advertised are no moderates. They are radicals. These individuals embrace Islamist supremacy and have demonstrated support for radical ideologies.

[Dilloduck]

Yes they are opposites and that was why I used them. In that your posts declared that it was hopeless to defend against Islam (defeatest attitude) and seem more like (cheerleading) their power , greatness and invincibility!
Had you truly researched about Britian's muslim scourge you would have sen the leftist alliance there with muslims. Leftists/dems defend and promote muslims here too.

here is a link..

http://www.redstate.com/breeanneh/20...joins-the-dnc/

Democratic National Convention will open with a focus on Islam. ?20,000 Muslims are expected to attend according to the?Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs (BIMA), the national Muslim American non-profit coordinating the two days of events they?claim?are non-political. ?”Jumah at the DNC” begins August 29 and will start with a Friday afternoon jummah prayer followed by other unnamed programs and events, leading up to the Islamic Regal Banquet. The following day will be an all day Islamic Cultural and Fun Fest which will include discussions on the topics of?Islamaphobia, Anti-Shariah, Middle Eastern Crisis, Patriot Act, National Defense Authorization Act and more. ?The purpose, according to BIMA, is to attract national and international attention to the plight of American Muslims and to hold political parties accountable for issues that affect them. ?However, not all Muslims feel that BIMA represents them and M. Zuhdi Jasser M.D., Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, has expressed serious concerns.

It is troubling that the Democratic National Convention has decided to promote and lend its name and national political platform to the organizers of the ?Jummah at the DNC?. The leaders of this event ? Jibril Hough and Imam Siraj Wahhaj as advertised are no moderates. They are radicals. These individuals embrace Islamist supremacy and have demonstrated support for radical ideologies.

Right --I'm cheerleading the Islamists power.

I guess you need to get with your boys and chase them muzzies outta the DNC.

[Drummond]

Cheerleading or a defeatist attitude ? They are polar opposites. You're gonna have to start making some sense here. Never said GB hasn't had socialism longer than we have. Just pointing out that since FDR we have had our share and really don't need to be warned of the dangers.

I disagree. OK, so maybe, you already recognise what dangers exist from any list I offer.

But, do you get how propagandist Lefties are ? How they insist upon painting their creed in as advantageous manner as possible, and regardless of the truths involved ?

An example of this sort of thing would be their re-labelling of realities to achieve the right psychological effect. Anyone having - for example - a real, decent, thoroughly reasonable concern about levels of immigration, can be branded as 'racist' in their eyes .. and with sufficient effort made to force this opinion on people, so the idea slowly sticks. The outcome, both favoured and deliberately fought for, is that nobody dares speak out when that immigration reaches levels where whole communities take root and insist that THEIR culture, not YOURS, predominates.

Getting the picture ?

If you have - as we've had - Socialist propaganda force-fed upon the general public for years and decades, eventually it sticks. People end up with beliefs, attitudes, which they think of as their own, but which in truth have been grafted on to their thinking. Such people think they're free to think and do as they please. In reality, with enough social pressure brought to bear from enough sources, people merely think as their Leftie authorities have planned them to think from the beginning.

So, you can get - as we had, a couple of years ago - our Archbishop of Canterbury, the head of the Church of England, publicly proposing that a limited form of Sharia Law could be permitted in the United Kingdom !!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...aw-stance.html

The Archbishop of Canterbury has been widely criticised after he called for aspects of Islamic sharia law to be adopted in Britain.

Dr Rowan Williams said that it "seems inevitable" that elements of the Muslim law, such as divorce proceedings, would be incorporated into British legislation.

The Archbishop's controversial stance has received widespread criticism from Christian and secular groups, the head of the equality watchdog, several high-profile Muslims and MPs from all parties.

Isn't it incredible, Dilloduck, that a leading CHRISTIAN would defer to Islamic law in such a fashion ?? Yet .. the evidence of such a betrayal of his OWN faith, to help the interests of a rival one, is all too evident.

[Dilloduck]

Damn Christian traitors ! It's a good thing the secularists have been attacking them all these years or there would be more of them.

[jimnyc]

Damn Christian traitors ! It's a good thing the secularists have been attacking them all these years or there would be more of them.

Allow me to try to explain something to you--again. Americans civilians and our allies ARE targets all over the world. Al quaeda hates anything in the middle east that isn't Arab or Miuslim. Some hate anyone who is not a Muslim.

It's not a matter of right or wrong--muslims are attacking. They have declared war on the US. Getting muslim to fight muslim is a good plan.

when was the last time a Christian cell blew up Muslim skyscrapers ?

Times sure are a changing!

[Dilloduck]

Times sure are a changing!

nah--just a little devil's advocate to see what plans people have in mind to change the situation. So far it's "Vote for Romney" and blow up nukes and stuff.

[jimnyc]

nah--just a little devil's advocate to see what plans people have in mind to change the situation. So far it's "Vote for Romney" and blow up nukes and stuff.

And a good movie if you like Pacino! - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118971/

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

nah--just a little devil's advocate to see what plans people have in mind to change the situation. So far it's "Vote for Romney" and blow up nukes and stuff.

Bomb Irans nukes is not a suggestion given to solve the muslim problem rather its a suggestion on actions necessary to protect Israel from a nuke attack that Iran has promised to deliver. Strike one right there. (1)
Vote Romney is not a suiggestion that would solve our muslim problem rather its a suggestion to solve our "obama the traitor" problem and with that our bad economic problems along with a host of other problems the clown has deliberately created for us!. Strike two right there. (2)
Toss out another one for strike three.- Maybe elaborate on the "stuff".--Tyr

[Dilloduck]

Bomb Irans nukes is not a suggestion given to solve the muslim problem rather its a suggestion on actions necessary to protect Israel from a nuke attack that Iran has promised to deliver. Strike one right there. (1)
Vote Romney is not a suiggestion that would solve our muslim problem rather its a suggestion to solve our "obama the traitor" problem and with that our bad economic problems along with a host of other problems the clown has deliberately created for us!. Strike two right there. (2)
Toss out another one for strike three.- Maybe elaborate on the "stuff".--Tyr

oh damn Strike 3 I'm out. Now let's hear your plan. btw Israel can defend themselves.

[Drummond]

Damn Christian traitors ! It's a good thing the secularists have been attacking them all these years or there would be more of them.

Well, it's rather difficult to see the Archbishop of Canterbury in any other way, given the evidence of his own words ...

As for 'secularists attacking them ..' .. er'm, aren't most Lefties keen on introducing secular Societies when they get the chance to ? Yet, our Lefties are NOT known for such attacks, quite the reverse. So I can't really recognise the truth of your comment in the real world. Sorry ...

[Drummond]

oh damn Strike 3 I'm out. Now let's hear your plan. btw Israel can defend themselves.

But tell me, WHY are you so determined to see the US as inactive in the matter of Israel ? Why is it that you're keen on seeing the US discredited as a reliable ally to those powers allied to you, when such allies need your support ?

[Drummond]

nah--just a little devil's advocate to see what plans people have in mind to change the situation. So far it's "Vote for Romney" and blow up nukes and stuff.

You mean, as opposed to voting for Obama, and being treated to an Obama indulging in endless diplomatic thumb-twiddling ?

[Dilloduck]

You mean, as opposed to voting for Obama, and being treated to an Obama indulging in endless diplomatic thumb-twiddling ?

What is Romney's plan for dealing with Islam?

[Dilloduck]

But tell me, WHY are you so determined to see the US as inactive in the matter of Israel ? Why is it that you're keen on seeing the US discredited as a reliable ally to those powers allied to you, when such allies need your support ?

They don't NEED any more money, weapons or American soldiers. It is WASTEFUL.

[jimnyc]

What is Romney's plan for dealing with Islam?

You should read his stance on issues pertaining to Syria and Iran, and then he also offers his stances on Afghanistan and Pakistan on his website too. I don't see him addressing it as dealing with or as a war with Islam, but rather individual countries. We could only guess at this point as to whether or not he would implement a tougher strategy, or make moves differently than Obama is approaching things at this point. And of course having a cooperative congress can make a difference too.