Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    7,727
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    243663

    Default Katrina "victims" aid tied to war funding bill ?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070522/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq
    Dems set war bill without Iraq timeline By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
    29 minutes ago



    WASHINGTON - In grudging concessions to President Bush, Democrats intend to draft an Iraq war-funding bill without a timeline for the withdrawal of U.S. troops and shorn of at least some of the billions they want for domestic programs, officials said Monday.


    The legislation would include the first federal minimum wage increase in more than a decade, a top priority for the Democrats who took control of Congress in January, the officials added.

    While details remain subject to change, the measure is designed to close the books by Friday on a bruising struggle between Bush and the Democratic-controlled Congress over the war. It would provide funds for military operations in Iraq through Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year.

    Democrats in both houses are expected to seek other opportunities later this year to challenge Bush's handling of the unpopular conflict.

    Bush vetoed one Iraq measure this spring, citing a troop withdrawal timeline and additional spending that Democrats included. The rejected legislation included $21 billion more than the president requested, and while some of it was targeted for the military, most of it was for domestic programs.

    Democratic officials stressed that key issues surrounding the funding measure remained unsettled, and an evening meeting of rank and file House members was postponed.

    One major uncertainty involved the spending that Democrats in both houses hope to include for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, farmers hit by natural disaster, low-income children's health and other programs. While determined to avoid a second veto, they are also hoping that an appetite for spending among GOP lawmakers will prod the administration to accept more than it would like

    A nutcase will do nutty things.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31139

    Default

    It's ridiculous enough that the Dems can't just pass a minimum wage bill on its own merits (of which there are none, BTW). Now they want to tie more pork to it?!? Ludicrous!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums