Originally Posted by
Gaffer
Yes that is the problem, because he has so many standing in the way to prevent proper investigation of things. He owns the justice dept and can stymie an investigation simply by classifying the most important things. Anyone who speaks out becomes a criminal. They started closing all the loop holes after nixon.
Obama's defenders like to point out the lack of hard evidence. That kind of evidence almost always takes a serious and extensive investigation. Obama controls access to most areas and ways to do such an investigation so he prevents the truth from coming out . THAT DOESNT STOP HIS FFING DEFENDERS THEY THEN WANT TO IGNORE HIS EFFORTS TO PREVENT SUCH AND CRY INSTEAD, WHERE IS THE HARD EVIDENCE? Obama is supposedly about to make war on Syria but as presented no hard evidence that Assad is guilty as charged. I hope Congress tells the SOB NO and he does it anyway. I think that may be a bridge too far and will at least get him impeached even if not convicted....-Tyr
18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.