Read the atrticle Lil, its classic sensationalism with little facts. CNN are reporters, not sources. The CNN article only names Ray Close as a source. The article refers to unnamed "sources", and the IAEA cites "outsde experts". Why are these other "sources" and "outside experts" unnnamed? Who are they? My guess is that each one of them is the same group.
These days you have to look at reporting very carefully. You may be right in your original assertion, I don't know, but this article doesn't come close to proving that.
Well glock.......I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree. I could post other links, but you'd dismiss them too.
Ok, read these and let me know what you think.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20...0154-5384r.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/internatio...999682,00.html
From the Times article: "A U.S. official said the Italians initially only described the documents to the CIA. Then the State Department obtained a set from a journalist and that led to an investigative trip to Niger by former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
Mr. Wilson said Niger's government told him that the country would not sell uranium to Iraq, but also informed him that Iraqis were in the country discussing unspecified commercial transactions, which could have included uranium-ore purchases, the U.S. official said. "
Much better written, it explains how the mistake was made without the sensationalism.
Well id like to see her feinstein boxer and reid out of office would b a damn good start
And Clinton................
If you attack the Clintons publically make sure all your friends know your not planning on commiting suicide ~ McCain 2008
Happiness is Obama's picture on the back of a milk carton.
Honestly, the only thing here seems to be that Pelosi got caught doing it, which is the problem. Most of our government officials are taking "fact-finding" trips, even with the permission of the pres, for reasons other than those stated.
If Pelosi did it, she should be nailed for it, if republicans did, they should be nailed for it, if Independents did it, they should be nailed for it. Anyone who has campaigned against these kinds of abuses, and done, should be beaten publically. It's fallacy to believe any one party is playing these little bs games with us more than the other. so really, the debate goes nowhere, as do a 100 other debates of the same sort, because they do not emphasize one key point: Why the hell are we still employing these assholes?
Must be desperate to drag up a long dead thread.............get a life retard.