Originally Posted by
fj1200
Checked the story for "dictate;" it's not in there. So it's your contention that Executive Orders are unconstitutional? I'd guess we can impeach about 44 Presidents for that one then.
And seeing as there are two branches of government that could take action here and if one branch is unable/unwilling to act then that leaves another option. That option may suck but there it is.
And the article isn't really worth discussing as it's relatively benign; it's the inference that one makes from the article that would be the point of discussion. But seeing as so many here are only able to discuss viewpoints that completely coincide with their own... discussion is likely dead.
You may do your own work. I debunk enough of your rants to bother with another. If you've got a point to make it's best to make it with fact and truth.
"Suddenly they don't!"?
Yeah, when was that?
How many more times does SCOTUS have to slap his ffing hand for your blinders come off!??
E.O. have limits and have to also be Constitutional and they are not allowed to be ready made laws used to circumvent Congress. By him doing that as he pleases he just nullifies Congress. That is an abrogation of his sworn oath. However he does it often and with a nation destroying plan so it's actually treason.
Wake up and smell his shit...
Holding your nose to backhand defend him makes you look deceitful. At least to me it does..
Your comment about E.O.'s make you look either clueless or deceitful, I call it the way I see it..-Tyr
18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.