Police cars' 'In God We Trust' decals draw complaints

[Noir]

Yep, in Liberal loony land, spending $50 bucks of a cops own money is equivalent to a $500 billion Government fiasco to further a false leftist agenda.

Can you quote for me where anyone has said the two are equivalent?

[Truth Detector]

Can you quote for me where anyone has said the two are equivalent?

I'm not here to lead Liberals to the OBVIOUS. You're going to have to do that yourself.

[Noir]

Can you quote for me where anyone has said the two are equivalent?

I'm not here to lead Liberals to the OBVIOUS. You're going to have to do that yourself.

So that's a no.
Good day.

[Gunny]

So that's a no.
Good day.

Don't read the bumper sticker. Or did you miss that part where it's your fault?

I wear a rebel flag t--shirt because I don't give a f*ck what you think and I'm allowed to express myself. But you think it's okay fags run all over downtown San Diego in g-strings? Because they can and we can and we can't?

Try practicing what you preach.

[Truth Detector]

So that's a no.
Good day.

Wrong again; I just don't like wallowing in the never ending circle ofstupidity with dishonest liberals.
So here you go……ONE time so as to educate you on how tocomprehend the OBVIOUS:

Well atlas public money hasn't beenwasted, silvers linings...

<o></o>

Yep; a whole $50 bucks ofhis own money was wasted. Meanwhile, anti-Christian leftist storm trooperscheer when the Obama administration pusses away $500 billion on failed dolorand green energy initiatives.

You leftists have very strange priorities. Liberals have to be the dumbest mostnaive fools on the planet.

Or maybe money was wasted onboth...

Yep, in Liberal loony land,spending $50 bucks of a cops own money is equivalent to a $500 billionGovernment fiasco to further a false leftist agenda.

<!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" oreferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"> <v:stroke joinstyle="miter"/> <v:formulas> <v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"/> <v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"/> <v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"/> <v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"/> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"/> <v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"/> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"/> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"/> </v:formulas> <vath o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"/> <o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"/></v:shapetype><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_1" o:spid="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.png" style='width:12pt; height:12pt;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square'> <v:imagedata src="file:///C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\ clip_image001.png" o:title="rolleyes"/></v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]-->[IMG]file:///C:/Users/Owner/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.png[/IMG]<!--[endif]-->

Can you quote for me where anyone hassaid the two are equivalent?

Yes; it was when you said:

Or maybe money was wasted onboth...

Like I said; I hate walking Liberals back to the OBVIOUSwhen they are being deliberately dishonest.
I won’t walk you through this again.

[Noir]

Can you quote for me where anyone has said the two are equivalent?

Yes; it was when you said:"Or maybe money was wasted on both..."

So at no point did i say they were equivalent, ace.

[Truth Detector]

So at no point did i say they were equivalent,ace.

<o></o>

I am amused when dishonest leftist thread trolls argue that one must SAYsomething rather than infer it. Be gone already. <o></o>

Or maybe money was wasted onboth...

<o></o>
<o></o>

[Noir]

<o></o>

I am amused when dishonest leftist thread trolls argue that one must SAYsomething rather than infer it. Be gone already. <o></o>
<o></o>
<o></o>

You're arguing with what you think you want me to have said, rather than what i have actually said and then (for your own benefit) clarified. That is not how you have a constructive conversation.

[fj1200]

Courts - the supreme court - allows the phrase on govt property. (shrug)

Because it's on our money?

[Gunny]

Because it's on our money?

Even when they're reading crap into law that doesn't exist?

[fj1200]

Even when they're reading crap into law that doesn't exist?

I honestly don't know.

[Gunny]

So I'll point this out and you can probably come up with a halfway decent answer. How many pieces of legislation do we need to quantify laws we already have? What's this dumbass repetition O'Reilly's ranting about? Some girl's name law. So whywaste time on the legislation if you aren't going to enforce it?

They aren't even charging this asshat with 1st degree murder. Sorry, you pull out a gun and shoot someone for no reason, I'm hammering your ass. I'm putting you on death row, matter of fact.

SO what goos just another law if no one can enforce it? Waste of paper in MY book.

[fj1200]

They aren't even charging this asshat with 1st degree murder.

We aren't talking about decals on cop cars any more are we?

[Gunny]

We aren't talking about decals on cop cars any more are we?

Same difference ... if I don't want fags on my TV what do I get told? Turn it off. SO don't look at people's bumper stickers. Two way street.

[fj1200]

Same difference ... if I don't want fags on my TV what do I get told? Turn it off. SO don't look at people's bumper stickers. Two way street.

The issue being that it's the government's bumper.