Pretty Well Sums It Up

[Kathianne]

As I said before, small scale corruption is one thing, but a conspiracy involving 10,000+ world scientists (including dozens of nobel laureates), dozens of respected world scientific institutions and dozens of first world countries would be unfathomable. You may disagree with the climate politics, I certainly often do actually, but don't mix that into the actual science.

Are you familiar with 'herd effect?'

[pete311]

Are you familiar with 'herd effect?'

Only as it applies to immunity. Careful that is science, could be a conspiracy...

[Gunny]

Only as it applies to immunity. Careful that is science, could be a conspiracy...

When you come to a gunfight it helps if you bring bullets.

[pete311]

When you come to a gunfight it helps if you bring bullets.

I notice when some members have nothing to say, they speak in riddles

[NightTrain]

As I said before, small scale corruption is one thing, but a conspiracy involving 10,000+ world scientists (including dozens of nobel laureates),

Crap, you're right. I forgot that Al Gore and Oblabla were backing that.

It's settled.

[Kathianne]

I notice when some members have nothing to say, they speak in riddles

Methinks it's not riddles as much as an observation based on past experiences. Like the time you were speaking authoritatively on Constitution, when challenged on the details admitted you really didn't know much about such things.

No harm there, just don't act superior, as you haven't a clue to what everyone else here does know.

[pete311]

Methinks it's not riddles as much as an observation based on past experiences. Like the time you were speaking authoritatively on Constitution, when challenged on the details admitted you really didn't know much about such things.

No harm there, just don't act superior, as you haven't a clue to what everyone else here does know.

I don't have a clue what any of this has to do with my reply to you. Tell me about this herd effect. All I can find is "herd behavior" and I don't see how it applies at all. Climate science is nothing like a riot, demonstration, strike or black friday.

[NightTrain]

I don't have a clue what any of this has to do with my reply to you. Tell me about this herd effect. All I can find is "herd behavior" and I don't see how it applies at all. Climate science is nothing like a riot, demonstration, strike or black friday.

Beyond what Kathi just pointed out, didn't I spank you already about Global Warming a couple months ago? Using your own sources, no less?

[pete311]

Beyond what Kathi just pointed out, didn't I spank you already about Global Warming a couple months ago? Using your own sources, no less?

I'm sorry, do you have something to add to this thread?

[Kathianne]

I don't have a clue what any of this has to do with my reply to you. Tell me about this herd effect. All I can find is "herd behavior" and I don't see how it applies at all. Climate science is nothing like a riot, demonstration, strike or black friday.

When some claim something is 'settled' as has the IPCC, and governments-two groups that have the power to control the flow of billions of $$$ to and fro themselves, a few things happen.

Those who dissent, well they don't get published, leading to reinforcement of said 'consensus.' Those that aren't published in academia find themselves without tenure or able to obtain funding.

It's almost like a 'conspiracy,' except those in control would certainly disagree.

There are literally tens of thousands of scientists that acknowledge that there is climate change, but question what degree, if any humans contribute or can do to change the effects. Meanwhile, the 'authorities' that proclaim 'consensus' tax or fine' and subsidize those they often are in bed with.

[pete311]

When some claim something is 'settled' as has the IPCC, and governments-two groups that have the power to control the flow of billions of $$$ to and fro themselves, a few things happen.

Source where IPCC claimed "It's settled"?

Those who dissent, well they don't get published, leading to reinforcement of said 'consensus.' Those that aren't published in academia find themselves without tenure or able to obtain funding.

Source?

There are literally tens of thousands of scientists that acknowledge that there is climate change, but question what degree, if any humans contribute or can do to change the effects. Meanwhile, the 'authorities' that proclaim 'consensus' tax or fine' and subsidize those they often are in bed with.

Don't mix your dislike for the politics with the science.

[Kathianne]

Source where IPCC claimed "It's settled"?



Source?



Don't mix your dislike for the politics with the science.

I'm not going on a rabbit hunt for you. Sorry, I don't do that for posters I know and like. I'm not mixing politics and science, the governing bodies and scientists that benefit are the ones doing that.

[pete311]

My question to all here is what would it take to convince you?

[pete311]

I'm not going on a rabbit hunt for you. Sorry, I don't do that for posters I know and like. I'm not mixing politics and science, the governing bodies and scientists that benefit are the ones doing that.

When you make important and bold claims, you should back them up otherwise it's just your opinion.

Politics mixes in everything. So why do you trust anything? How can you drive in a car when the science behind it and the companies who build and sell them are involved in politics. How can you trust that car?

[Kathianne]

When you make important and bold claims, you should back them up otherwise it's just your opinion.

Politics mixes in everything. So why do you trust anything? How can you drive in a car when the science behind it and the companies who build and sell them are involved in politics. How can you trust that car?

Do you see the irony here?